ArticleCancer science2021
Identification of novel autoantibody signatures and evaluation of a panel of autoantibodies in breast cancer.
Article in Cancer science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Tumor antigen-associated autoantibodies: generation mechanisms, roles in tumorigenesis and progression, and clinical application prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- ESCCPred: a machine learning model for diagnostic prediction of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma using autoantibody profiles.British journal of cancer · 2024Article
- Humoral immune response to tumor-associated antigen Ubiquilin 1 (UBQLN1) and its tumor-promoting potential in lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Association of elevated autoantibody to high expression of GNAS in hepatocellular carcinoma.Heliyon · 2023Article
- Article
- Autoantibodies to PAX5, PTCH1, and GNA11 as Serological Biomarkers in the Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Hispanic Americans.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- The Implication of Serum Autoantibodies in Prognosis of Canine Mammary Tumors.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Autoantibodies as biomarkers for breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Identification of novel autoantibody signatures and evaluation of a panel of autoantibodies in breast cancer.Cancer science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor-associated autoantibodies (TAAb) could be serological tumor markers. This study aims to discover novel TAAb signatures for breast cancer (BC) detection. The protein microarray was used to identify candidate TAAb, which were further validated in 1197 sera from BC, benign breast diseases (BD), and healthy controls (HC) by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In addition, 319 preoperative and postoperative sera were evaluated. A panel was determined using four different classifiers. Twelve TAAb were identified with frequencies of 15.8%-59.2%; their levels were significantly decreased in postoperative sera compared to those in preoperative sera (P < .05). A panel with six TAAb was developed and evaluated. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.879 (74.3% sensitivity, 91.9% specificity) and 0.865 (69.7% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity) for distinguishing BC from HC in the training set and test set, respectively. The panel had an AUC of .884 (71.2% sensitivity, 90.5% specificity) for discriminating BC from BD. For identifying BC from all controls (HC+BD), the AUC was .916 (78.9% sensitivity, 90.2% specificity). The AUC of the panel was .920 and .934 for distinguishing stage I-II and age < 50 BC from HC, respectively. These identified TAAb have the potential to provide a non-invasive approach to detect BC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.