ArticleJournal of clinical psychology2021
A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity.
Article in Journal of clinical psychology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Which EDE-Q items are structurally relevant in borderline personality disorder? An exploratory graph analysis.Borderline personality disorder and emotion dysregulation · 2026Article
- Developmental changes in youth affect: A within-person approach.Emotion (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- Revisiting dimensionality in measurement of sense of coherence among rural healthcare workers using network analysis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Cognitive Signatures of Depressive and Anhedonic Symptoms and Affective States Using Computational Modeling and Neurocognitive Testing.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2024Article
- The psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Demoralization Scale (DS-II) in women with breast cancer.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2024Article
- Network-based validation of the psychometric questionnaire EDI-3 for the assessment of eating disorders.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Tasting More Than Just Food: Effect of Aesthetic Appeal of Plate Patterns on Food Perception.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Exploring the Effect of Parental Styles on Social Skills: The Mediating Role of Affects.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- A modern network approach to revisiting the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) construct validity.Journal of clinical psychology · 2021Article
- Exploratory Graph Analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire for Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander Children.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe factor structure of the Positive and Negative Affective Schedule (PANAS) is still a topic of debate. There are several reasons why using Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA) for scale validation is advantageous and can help understand and resolve conflicting results in the factor analytic literature.
objectiveThe main objective of the present study was to advance the knowledge regarding the factor structure underlying the PANAS scores by utilizing the different functionalities of the EGA method. EGA was used to (1) estimate the dimensionality of the PANAS scores, (2) establish the stability of the dimensionality estimate and of the item assignments into the dimensions, and (3) assess the impact of potential redundancies across item pairs on the dimensionality and structure of the PANAS scores.
methodThis assessment was carried out across two studies that included two large samples of participants. RESULTS AND
conclusionIn sum, the results are consistent with a two-factor oblique structure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.