Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115344›Full record

SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2021

Effects of Spaceflight on Musculoskeletal Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, Considerations for Interplanetary Travel.

Paul Comfort, John J McMahon, Paul A Jones, Matthew Cuthbert, Kristina Kendall, Jason P Lake, G Gregory Haff

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Spaceflight alters host-gut microbiota interactions.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2024
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Paul ComfortHuman Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, GM, UK. p.comfort@salford.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1131-8626
John J McMahonHuman Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, GM, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9952-7846
Paul A JonesHuman Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, GM, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-7670
Matthew CuthbertHuman Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, GM, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0960-9085
Kristina KendallSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3029-0435
Jason P LakeSchool of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4381-0938
G Gregory HaffHuman Performance Laboratory, Directorate of Psychology and Sport, University of Salford, Salford, GM, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0676-7750
Edith Cowan University · AUUniversity of Salford · GBThe Football Association · GBUniversity of Chichester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIf interplanetary travel is to be successful over the coming decades, it is essential that countermeasures to minimize deterioration of the musculoskeletal system are as effective as possible, given the increased duration of spaceflight associated with such missions. The aim of this review, therefore, is to determine the magnitude of deconditioning of the musculoskeletal system during prolonged spaceflight and recommend possible methods to enhance the existing countermeasures.

methodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed, Ovid and Scopus databases. 5541 studies were identified prior to the removal of duplicates and the application of the following inclusion criteria: (1) group means and standard deviations for pre- and post-spaceflight for measures of strength, muscle mass or bone density were reported (or provided by the corresponding author when requested via e-mail), (2) exercise-based countermeasures were included, (3) the population of the studies were human, (4) muscle function was assessed and (5) spaceflight rather than simulated spaceflight was used. The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using a modified Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale for quality, with publication bias assessed using a failsafe N (Rosenthal method), and consistency of studies analysed using I

resultsA total of 11 studies were included in the meta-analyses. Heterogeneity of the completed meta-analyses was conducted revealing homogeneity for bone mineral density (BMD) and spinal muscle size (Tau

conclusionsCurrent exercise countermeasures result in small reductions in BMD during long-duration spaceflight. In contrast, such exercise protocols do not alleviate the reductions in muscle function or muscle size, which may be attributable to the low to moderate loads reported by crewmembers and the interference effect associated with concurrent training. It is recommended that higher-load resistance exercise and the use of high-intensity interval training should be investigated, to determine if such modifications to the reported training practices result in more effective countermeasures to the deleterious effect of long-duration spaceflight on the muscular system.

Indexed as

Muscle StrengthSpace FlightBone DensityExerciseHumansTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID34115344
PMCPMC8449769
OpenAlexW3169790926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.