ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2021
Mineralogy, geochemistry,
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Innovative isotopic modeling and risk assessment of PTEs and PAHs in urban soils.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determination of the kidney stone composition using infrared spectroscopy in Iran at a national referral center during 2019-2023.Asian journal of urology · 2025Article
- The key role of major and trace elements in the formation of five common urinary stones.BMC urology · 2024Article
- Special issue on "geochemistry, soil contamination and human health. Part 1".Environmental geochemistry and health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Owing to the importance of urinary stones as one of the biominerals in the human body, it is necessary to investigate their chemical composition and mineralogy. In this matter, a mineralogical study using X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy indicated that urinary stones in Lorestan Province were divided into 5 groups of calcium oxalate, urate, cysteine, phosphate and mixed stones (Whewellite, uric acid, phosphate). In this regard, the microscopic studies revealed that Whewellite was the most important mineral phase among various phases. In the following, the major and rare elements of each group were determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) and X-ray fluorescence analysis. The obtained results demonstrated that Ca was found the most abundant element in urinary stones. In the analysis results of the major oxides, compared to other major oxides, CaO had the highest frequency in urinary stones. The reason was due to the role of calcium in most of the basic functions in cell metabolism. The average values of isotope
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.