SynthesisJournal of medical ultrasonics (2001)2021
Clinical utility of ultrasonography imaging in musculoskeletal conditions: A Systematic review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- External wrist ratio is not a proxy for internal carpal tunnel shape: Implications for evaluating carpal tunnel syndrome risk.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Ultrasound therapy for pain reduction in musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Therapeutic advances in chronic disease · 2024Article
- Comparison of ultrasonographic characteristics of deep abdominal muscles in women with and without chronic neck pain: a case-control study.Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions · 2022Article
- Comments on "Clinical utility of ultrasonography imaging in musculoskeletal conditions: a systematic review and meta-analysis".Journal of medical ultrasonics (2001) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimising ultrasonography imaging (UI) applications for clients is a highly specific and sensitive add-on method. The aim of this meta-analysis was to systematically evaluate the clinical utilisation of UI in musculoskeletal conditions by rehabilitation providers in the past decade. Two reviewers independently assessed relevant research articles from five databases electronically (Medline, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, ProQuest, EBSCO) and screened titles and abstracts based on predefined eligibility criteria (2010- 2020). A total of 147 articles were screened for eligibility by two reviewers independently, and any disagreements were resolved by another reviewer using Rayyan QCRI software. Ninety-seven duplicates were removed, and after excluding 21 studies, 16 randomized controlled trials were included and full texts retrieved. Data were synthesised using Revman 5.4 software for qualitative analysis and risk-of-bias assessment. Four similar studies were statistically analysed for heterogeneity of abdominal muscle contraction ratios. Two interventional studies were also analysed to assess the effect of feedback. The diagnostic application of UI was investigated using a consistent amount of literature, though from a rehabilitation perspective the literature is inconclusive. The clinical utility of UI in rehabilitation by physical therapists is conclusive and has potential to advance clinical practice. Further well-designed randomized controlled trials minimising selection biases will help improve the quality in this domain. Critical reflection, clinical reasoning, and mutual goal setting will help practising physical therapists to scrutinize the clinical practice more objectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.