Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115233›Full record

ArticleJournal of plant research2021

Consistent scaling of whole-shoot respiration between Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and trees.

Mofei Wang, Shigeta Mori, Yoko Kurosawa, Juan Pedro Ferrio, Keiko Yamaji, Kohei Koyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of plant research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mofei WangThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Iwate University, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8550, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4067-9970
Shigeta MoriThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Iwate University, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8550, Japan. morishigeta@tds1.tr.yamagata-u.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5604-2443
Yoko KurosawaThe United Graduate School of Agricultural Science, Iwate University, Morioka, Iwate, 020-8550, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1419-7575
Juan Pedro FerrioAragon Agency for Research and Development (ARAID), 50018, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5904-7821
Keiko YamajiGraduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8577, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2875-5619
Kohei KoyamaDepartment of Agro-environmental Science, Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Obihiro, Hokkaido, 080-8555, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-3130

Funding

Gobierno de Aragón Reference Group H09_20RJapan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H04871Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 18K06406Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H01161Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 19H02987Japan Society for the Promotion of Science L-14560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Both Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) and tree forests have a large biomass; they are considered to play an important role in ecosystem carbon budgets. The scaling relationship between individual whole-shoot (i.e., aboveground parts) respiration and whole-shoot mass provides a clue for comparing the carbon budgets of Moso bamboo and tree forests. However, nobody has empirically demonstrated whether there is a difference between these forest types in the whole-shoot scaling relationship. We developed whole-shoot chambers and measured the shoot respiration of 58 individual mature bamboo shoots from the smallest to the largest in a Moso bamboo forest, and then compared them with that of 254 tree shoots previously measured. For 30 bamboo shoots, we measured the respiration rate of leaves, branches, and culms. We found that the scaling exponent of whole-shoot respiration of bamboo fitted by a simple power function on a log-log scale was 0.843 (95 % CI 0.797-0.885), which was consistent with that of trees, 0.826 (95 % CI 0.799-0.851), but higher than 3/4, the value typifying the Kleiber's rule. The respiration rates of leaves, branches, and culms at the whole-shoot level were proportional to their mass, revealing a constant mean mass-specific respiration of 1.19, 0.224, and 0.0978 µmol CO

Indexed as

EcosystemTreesForestsPoaceaeRespirationDivision of labor among bamboo shootsMetabolic scalingOrgan respirationPhyllostachys pubescensWhole-shoot respiration

Identifiers

PMID34115233
PMCPMC8364903

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.