Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115162›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2022

Methenamine hippurate compared with trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections: a randomized clinical trial.

Carolyn Botros, Svjetlana Lozo, Shilpa Iyer, Alexandra Warren, Roger Goldberg, Janet Tomezsko, Karen Sasso, Peter Sand, Adam Gafni-Kane, Adam Biener and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The MAK collection for occupational health and safety · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Urinary tract infections in immunocompromised patients.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025
    Review
  11. State-of-the-Art Review: Recurrent Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infections in Women.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Carolyn BotrosLehigh Valley Health Network, 1611 Pond Road, Allentown, PA, 18104, USA. carolynbotros@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5823-1109
Svjetlana LozoColumbia University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Shilpa IyerUniversity of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alexandra WarrenCentral Michigan University College of Medicine, Mount Pleasant, MI, USA.
Roger GoldbergNorthShore University Health System, Skokie, IL, USA.
Janet TomezskoWomen's Health Institute of Illinois, Skokie, IL, USA.
Karen SassoWomen's Health Institute of Illinois, Skokie, IL, USA.
Peter SandNorthShore University Health System, Skokie, IL, USA.
Adam Gafni-KaneNorthShore University Health System, Skokie, IL, USA.
Adam BienerLafayette College, Easton, PA, USA.
Sylvia Botros-BreyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
NorthShore University HealthSystem · USDemoiselle 2 Femme · USCentral Michigan University · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USLafayette College · USLehigh Valley Hospital-Pocono · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThe objective was to find an alternative treatment to a low-dose antibiotic for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections (UTI) and to evaluate the difference in rates of reinfection within 1 year when treated with methenamine hippurate for prophylaxis compared with trimethoprim.

methodsWe present a non-blinded randomized trial comparing methenamine hippurate with trimethoprim for the prevention of recurrent UTI at 12 months after starting treatment. Women over 18 who had at least two culture-positive UTI in the prior 6 months or three in the prior year were included. Ninety-two patients met enrollment criteria and were randomized to receive daily prophylaxis with methenamine hippurate or trimethoprim for a minimum of 6 months. Both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses if patients received the alternative drug after randomization were analyzed using Student's t test, Mann-Whitney U test, Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and a logistic and multivariate regression model. The primary outcome of this study was culture-proven UTI recurrence by 12 months after initiating prophylaxis.

resultsIn the intent-to-treat analysis, we found no difference between groups in recurrent UTI, with a 65% (28 out of 43) recurrence in the trimethoprim group versus 65% (28 out of 43) in the methenamine hippurate group (p = 1.00). In the per-protocol analysis, 65% (26 out of 40) versus 65% (30 out of 46) of patients had UTI recurrences in the trimethoprim group versus the methenamine hippurate group (p = 0.98).

conclusionsMethenamine hippurate may be an alternative for the prevention of recurrent UTI, with similar rates of recurrence and adverse effects to trimethoprim.

Indexed as

TrimethoprimUrinary Tract InfectionsFemaleHippuratesHumansMethenamineHippuratesMethenaminemethenamine hippurateTrimethoprimAntimicrobial stewardshipBacteriuriaUrinary tract infectionWomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID34115162
OpenAlexW3166460976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.