Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115129›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2021

Trends in Venous Thromboembolism Anticoagulation in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19.

Valerie M Vaughn, Monica Yost, Chelsea Abshire, Scott A Flanders, David Paje, Paul Grant, Scott Kaatz, Tae Kim, Geoffrey D Barnes

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. SevereFrontiers in medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valerie M VaughnDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Monica YostMichigan Value Collaborative, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Chelsea AbshireMichigan Value Collaborative, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Scott A FlandersDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
David PajeDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Paul GrantDivision of Hospital Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Scott KaatzDivision of Hospital Medicine, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan.
Tae KimMichigan Arthroplasty Registry Collaborative Quality Initiative, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Geoffrey D BarnesDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USHenry Ford Hospital · USMichigan Medicine · US

Funding

Developing an Implementation Strategy to Improve Peri-procedural Anticoagulation Management for Patients with Atrial FibrillationK01HL135392 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BARNES, GEOFFREY DOUGLAS · 2017 to 2021
$842k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL135392
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common complication of COVID-19. It is not well understood how hospitals have managed VTE prevention and the effect of prevention strategies on mortality. Objective: To characterize frequency, variation across hospitals, and change over time in VTE prophylaxis and treatment-dose anticoagulation in patients hospitalized for COVID-19, as well as the association of anticoagulation strategies with in-hospital and 60-day mortality. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study of adults hospitalized with COVID-19 used a pseudorandom sample from 30 US hospitals in the state of Michigan participating in a collaborative quality initiative. Data analyzed were from patients hospitalized between March 7, 2020, and June 17, 2020. Data were analyzed through March 2021. Exposures: Nonadherence to VTE prophylaxis (defined as missing ≥2 days of VTE prophylaxis) and receipt of treatment-dose or prophylactic-dose anticoagulants vs no anticoagulation during hospitalization. Main Outcomes and Measures: The effect of nonadherence and anticoagulation strategies on in-hospital and 60-day mortality was assessed using multinomial logit models with inverse probability of treatment weighting. Results: Of a total 1351 patients with COVID-19 included (median [IQR] age, 64 [52-75] years; 47.7% women, 48.9% Black patients), only 18 (1.3%) had a confirmed VTE, and 219 (16.2%) received treatment-dose anticoagulation. Use of treatment-dose anticoagulation without imaging ranged from 0% to 29% across hospitals and increased over time (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.46; 95% CI, 1.31-1.61 per week). Of 1127 patients who ever received anticoagulation, 392 (34.8%) missed 2 or more days of prophylaxis. Missed prophylaxis varied from 11% to 61% across hospitals and decreased markedly over time (aOR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.82-0.97 per week). VTE nonadherence was associated with higher 60-day (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.03-1.67) but not in-hospital mortality (aHR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.03). Receiving any dose of anticoagulation (vs no anticoagulation) was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (only prophylactic dose: aHR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26-0.52; any treatment dose: aHR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.25-0.58). However, only the prophylactic dose of anticoagulation remained associated with lower mortality at 60 days (prophylactic dose: aHR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.51-0.90; treatment dose: aHR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.63-1.35). Conclusions and Relevance: This large, multicenter cohort of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, found evidence of rapid dissemination and implementation of anticoagulation strategies, including use of treatment-dose anticoagulation. As only prophylactic-dose anticoagulation was associated with lower 60-day mortality, prophylactic dosing strategies may be optimal for patients hospitalized with COVID-19.

Indexed as

SARS-CoV-2AgedAnticoagulantsCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHospital MortalityHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateUnited StatesVenous ThromboembolismAnticoagulants

Identifiers

PMID34115129
PMCPMC8196344
OpenAlexW3172283028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.