Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34115026›Full record

ArticleMedicine2021

Analysis of sagittal curvature and its influencing factors in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Cong Zhang, Yidan Wang, Jinghong Yu, Feng Jin, Yunfeng Zhang, Yan Zhao, Yu Fu, Kai Zhang, Jianzhong Wang, Lina Dai and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The effect of Providence night-time bracing on the sagittal profile in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Cong ZhangThe First Clinical College of Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Yidan WangDepartment of Postgraduates, Inner Mongolia Medical University.ORCID 0000-0002-0952-5386
Jinghong YuDepartment of Medical imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Feng JinDepartment of Medical imaging, The First Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Yunfeng ZhangDepartment of Medical imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Yan ZhaoDepartment of Spine Surgeon, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot.
Yu FuDepartment of Spine Surgeon, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Huhhot.
Kai ZhangThe Second Hospital of Ulanqab, Ulanqab.
Jianzhong WangDepartment of Anatomy, Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Lina DaiDepartment of Anatomy, Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Mingjie GaoDepartment of Postgraduates, Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Zhijun LiDepartment of Anatomy, Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Lidong WangDepartment of Medical imaging, Inner Mongolia International Mongolian Medical Hospital, Huhhot, China.
Xiaohe LiDepartment of Anatomy, Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Haiyan WangDepartment of Anatomy, Inner Mongolia Medical University.
Mongolian National University · MNInner Mongolia International Mongolian Hospital · CNMongolian National University of Medical Sciences · MNS.P.E.C.I.E.S. · US

Funding

Follow-up Research Project of Inner Mongolia Medical University 2020Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2016 ms08131Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2020 lh08021Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2020 ms08124Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region Science and Technology Innovation Guidance Project 2017National Natural Science Foundation of China 81260269National Natural Science Foundation of China 81460330National Natural Science Foundation of China 81560348National Natural Science Foundation of China 81860383Science and Technology Innovation Guidance Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2017Science and Technology Plan Project of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region 2019GG115Young Science and Technology Talents Project of Inner Mongolia Education Department njyt-15-b05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractThis study aimed to explore the characteristics of changes in the sagittal arrangement of the spine between adolescent patients with idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and normal adolescents, the risk factors for AIS and the factors affecting the progress of AIS.X-ray images of the full length of the spine in standing position were taken in AIS patients and normal adolescents. Radiographic measurements made at intermediate follow-up included the following:C1 and C2 cervical lordosis and C2 - C7 curvature of cervical lordosis, C2-C7sagittal horizontal distance (C2-C7SagittalVerticalAxis, C2-C7SVA), TS-CL, after thoracic lobe (Thoracic Kyphosis, TK), thoracic lumbar segment Angle (thoracolumbar kyphosis, [TLK]), lumbar lordosis Angle (Lumbar Lordosis, LL), sacral slope Angle (Sacrum Slope, SS), pelvic tilt Angle (Pelvic Tilt, PT), pelvic incidence (PI), L5 Incidence (Lumbar5 Slope (L5S), L5 incidence (Lumbar5 Incidence (L5I), sagittal horizontal distance (CSVA), lower depression Angle of the 2nd cervical spine. The difference of sagittal plane parameters between AIS group and normal adolescent group was compared. To evaluate the progress of AIS, correlation analysis was conducted between diagonal 2 and other parameters. The main risk factors of AIS were determined by binary Logistic analysis.The CSVA of AIS patients was higher than that of healthy adolescents (AIS: 27.64 ± 19.56) mm. Healthy adolescents: (17.74 ± 12.8) mm), L5S (AIS: 19.93°= 7.07° and healthy adolescents: 15.38°= 7.78°, P = .024 < .05), C2 downward sag Angle (AIS: 15.12°= 2.7°;Healthy adolescents: 12.97°= 4.56°); AIS patients had lower TS-CL (AIS: 22.48 ± 6.09 and healthy adolescents: 28.26°= 10.32°), PT (AIS: 10.42°= 4.53° and healthy adolescents: 15.80°=7.68°), (AIS: 41.87°=9.72° and healthy adolescents: 48.75°= 8.22°). The main risk factor for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents was L5 (OR = 1.239, 95%CI = 1.049-1.463, P = .012 < .05).L5S is a major risk factor for idiopathic scoliosis in adolescents. The larger PI is, the higher the risk of scoliosis progression is. In AIS patients, lumbar lordosis is increased, cervical lordosis is reduced, and even cervical kyphosis occurs.

Indexed as

Risk AssessmentScoliosisAdolescentBiometryBody HeightCervical VertebraeDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleRadiographyRisk FactorsSpine

Identifiers

PMID34115026
PMCPMC8202640
OpenAlexW3167244066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.