Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114747›Full record

ArticleInternational wound journal2022

Age-based inter-subject variability in platelet and white blood cell concentrations of platelet-rich plasma prepared using a new application to blood separation system.

Bibiana Trevisson, Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, David Sevillano, Natalia González, Marta Losa-Iglesias, Daniel López-López, Luis Alou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bibiana TrevissonSALBIS Research Group, Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad de León, León, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6136-2935
Ricardo Becerro-de-Bengoa-VallejoNursing Department, School of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1568-7602
David SevillanoMicrobiology Section, Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0212-2194
Natalia GonzálezMicrobiology Section, Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6874-954X
Marta Losa-IglesiasNursing and Stomatology Department, Faculty of Health Science, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7588-2069
Daniel López-LópezResearch, Health and Podiatry Group, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, Ferrol, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9818-6290
Luis AlouMicrobiology Section, Medicine Department, School of Medicine, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0859-008X
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de León · ESUniversidade da Coruña · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The benefit of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) treatment is still under discussion. Variations in PRP products, consequence of the lack of a standardised protocol for the multitude of commercially available blood separation systems and the lack of knowledge of the optimal composition of PRP or its suitability for the proposed indication are some of the reasons behind clinical inconsistencies. The impact of inter-subject variability in PRP has received less attention in comparison. The purpose of this study was to determine the inter-subject variability, based on age, in the concentrates prepared by a new blood concentration system. Twenty-six healthy volunteers of both genders (29-93 years) were enrolled. Whole blood (WB) was collected from each participant to prepare PRP using the Easy PRP kit. Platelets and white blood cells (WBC) from WB and PRP were analysed after split population by age; patients younger than 65 years (n = 13) and patients ≥65 years old (n = 13). Among the demographic characteristics tested, only age was significantly different between the groups. Cell capture efficiency of the system was specific for each type of blood cell and identical for both age groups. Platelets and WBC in PRP were higher than in WB (P < .001). In WB, platelets and WBC concentrations were significantly lower in older group (P ≤ .035). These differences persisted in the prepared PRP (P ≤ .004). The ageing of population has a strong influence on the haematocrit and therefore on the composition of PRP. Because the efficiency of blood separator system seems to be constant across individuals, the inter-subject haematocrit variability based on age could be used as a predictor of resulting PRP. The clinical application of PRP should be restricted to the specific cell capture capacity of the different commercial devices.

Indexed as

Blood PlateletsPlatelet-Rich PlasmaAgedFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansLeukocyte CountLeukocytesMalebloodleukocytesplatelet-rich plasma

Identifiers

PMID34114747
PMCPMC8762541
OpenAlexW3172317401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.