Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114729›Full record

SynthesisInternational wound journal2022

Effect of training programmes on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries: A meta-analysis.

Bao Yan, Huang Dandan, Meng Xiangli

RetractedAbstract readMeta-AnalysisRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bao YanDepartment of Outpatient, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China.
Huang DandanDepartment of Neurosurgery Ward, Shaoxing People's Hospital, Shaoxing, China.
Meng XiangliDepartment of General Ward, Shaoxing Central Hospital, Shaoxing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5463-109X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the education effects on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries. A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was carried out, and 29 studies included 5704 nurses at the start of the study; 3800 of them were experiment or post-training and 3804 were control or per-training. They were reporting relationships between the education effects on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the education effects on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Experiment or post-trained nurses had significantly higher knowledge score (MD, 10.00; 95% CI, 7.61-12.39, P < .001), number of nurses with proper knowledge (OR, 20.70; 95% CI, 10.80-39.67, P < .001), practice score (MD, 12.39; 95% CI, 5.37-19.42, P < .001), and number of nurses with proper practice (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.75-7.25, P < .001), attitudes score (MD, 7.46; 95% CI, 2.94-11.99, P < .001) compared with control or pertained nurses. Training may have a beneficial effect on improving the nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries, which was obvious in improving knowledge, practice, and attitudes post-training. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Indexed as

NursesPressure UlcerClinical CompetenceHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansknowledgenursepracticepressure injurytraining program

Identifiers

PMID34114729
PMCPMC8762546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.