SynthesisInternational wound journal2022
Effect of training programmes on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries: A meta-analysis.
Synthesis in International wound journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effect of e-learning program for improving nurse knowledge and practice towards managing pressure injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Nursing open · 2024Pooled it
- Effect of training programmes on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries: A meta-analysis.International wound journal · 2022Pooled it
- Assessment of Healthcare Workers' Knowledge, Attitude, and Practices in Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management in Nigeria.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- RETRACTION: Effect of Training Programmes on Nurses' Ability to Care for Subjects with Pressure Injuries: A Meta-Analysis.International wound journal · 2025Article
- The effect of self-made video assessment on standardized nursing skills training.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Nurses' experiences of hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention in acute healthcare services in Victoria, Australia: A qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework.International wound journal · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-03-26Author Unresponsive · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the education effects on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries. A systematic literature search up to April 2021 was carried out, and 29 studies included 5704 nurses at the start of the study; 3800 of them were experiment or post-training and 3804 were control or per-training. They were reporting relationships between the education effects on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) or the mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to assess the education effects on nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries using the dichotomous or continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Experiment or post-trained nurses had significantly higher knowledge score (MD, 10.00; 95% CI, 7.61-12.39, P < .001), number of nurses with proper knowledge (OR, 20.70; 95% CI, 10.80-39.67, P < .001), practice score (MD, 12.39; 95% CI, 5.37-19.42, P < .001), and number of nurses with proper practice (OR, 3.56; 95% CI, 1.75-7.25, P < .001), attitudes score (MD, 7.46; 95% CI, 2.94-11.99, P < .001) compared with control or pertained nurses. Training may have a beneficial effect on improving the nurses' ability to care for subjects with pressure injuries, which was obvious in improving knowledge, practice, and attitudes post-training. Further studies are required to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.