ArticleClinical oral implants research2021
Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation-induced liver injury.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient double-layer sintering of titanomagnetite concentrate.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Bone healing around titanium implants in a preclinical model of bile duct ligation-induced liver injury.Clinical oral implants research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesChronic liver disease increases the risk for periodontal disease and osteoporotic fractures, but its impacts on bone regeneration remain unknown. Herein, we studied the impact of liver cirrhosis on peri-implant bone formation. MATERIAL AND
methodsA total of 20 male Wistar rats were randomly divided into two groups: one with the common bile duct ligated (BDL) and the respective sham-treated control group (SHAM). After four weeks of disease induction, titanium mini-screws were inserted into the tibia. Successful induction of liver cirrhosis was confirmed by the presence of clinical symptoms. Another four weeks later, peri-implant bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV) and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) were determined by histomorphometric analysis.
resultsPeri-implant bone formation was not significantly different between the SHAM and BDL groups. In the cortical compartment, the median percentage of peri-implant new bone was 10.1% (95% CI of mean 4.0-35.7) and 22.5% (13.8-30.6) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .26). Consistently, the new bone in direct contact with the implant was 18.1% (0.4-37.8) and 23.3% (9.2-32.8) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .38). When measuring the medullary compartment, the new bone area was 7.1% (4.8-10.4) and 10.4% (7.2-13.5) in the SHAM and BDL groups, respectively (p = .17). Medullary new bone in direct contact with the implant was 10.0% (1.2-50.4) and 20.6% (16.8-35.3) in SHAM and BDL groups, respectively, and thus comparable between the two groups (p = .46).
conclusionsBile duct ligation has no significant impact on the early stages of peri-implant bone formation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.