Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114677›Full record

ArticleJournal of veterinary internal medicine2021

Successful nutritional control of scratching and clinical signs associated with adverse food reaction: A randomized controlled COSCAD'18 adherent clinical trial in dogs in the United States.

James L Weemhoff, Jennifer M MacLeay, John Brejda, Heidi Schiefelbein, Susan M Wernimont, Kathy L Gross

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial, Veterinary
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of veterinary internal medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Response of pet owners to Whistle FITFrontiers in veterinary science · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

James L WeemhoffPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, Topeka, Kansas 66616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6793-4703
Jennifer M MacLeayPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, Topeka, Kansas 66616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9198-8071
John BrejdaAlpha Statistics, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7197-9565
Heidi SchiefelbeinPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, Topeka, Kansas 66616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7466-3163
Susan M WernimontPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, Topeka, Kansas 66616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7203-1349
Kathy L GrossPet Nutrition Center, Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc, Topeka, Kansas 66616, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9614-2692
Nutrition 21 (United States) · USUniversity of Nebraska–Lincoln · US

Funding

Hill's Pet Nutrition
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdverse reactions to food are a common dermatological condition in dogs, requiring nutritional intervention using a novel or hydrolysate protein-based food.

objectiveTo evaluate a therapeutic food containing egg and phytonutrients in dogs with food allergies using an activity monitor and core outcome set for canine atopic dermatitis (COSCAD'18) guidelines and in a controlled double-masked, multicenter, prospective clinical trial. ANIMALS: Adult dogs with a history of adverse food reaction as diagnosed by a food elimination trial were recruited from general practices.

methodsAfter a 21-day baseline period, dogs were randomized to test or positive control (hydrolyzed protein) food for 21 days. Owner (pruritus visual analog score [PVAS], coat quality, food acceptance, and satisfaction) and veterinarian (canine atopic dermatitis lesion index [CADLI], physical examination) assessments were completed on days 0, 21, and 42. Dogs wore a collar-mounted activity monitor to record scratching and shaking behavior throughout the study. Statistical analysis included within-group comparison to baseline and between-group comparison at study end using a significance threshold of alpha = 0.05.

resultsAt the end of the treatment period, all results were similar between groups for CADLI, PVAS, owner satisfaction, activity, and questionnaire data. Scores for hair dullness, brittleness, amount of dandruff, feces quality, and food acceptance were positive and not statistically different between groups. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The therapeutic test food was well-accepted and efficacious in managing signs of adverse reactions to food compared to baseline as well as compared to the positive control food.

Indexed as

Dermatitis, AtopicDog DiseasesAllergensAnimalsDogsProspective StudiesPruritusUnited StatesAllergensactivity monitorcanine adverse food reactionseggnovel proteinpruritus

Identifiers

PMID34114677
PMCPMC8295670
OpenAlexW4205404663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.