Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114627›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of experimental biology2021

Does the choosiness of female crickets change as they age?

Edith Julieta Sarmiento-Ponce, Stephen Rogers, Berthold Hedwig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of experimental biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Light alters calling-song characteristics in crickets.The Journal of experimental biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Divergent alternative mating tactics in convergent male reproductive morphs.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Edith Julieta Sarmiento-PonceDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Stephen RogersDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Berthold HedwigDepartment of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1132-0056

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For crickets, which approach singing males by phonotaxis, the female choosiness hypothesis postulates that young females should be more selective of male calling song patterns than older individuals. However, there is no information about the behavioural preferences of females over their complete adulthood. We analysed phonotaxis in female Gryllus bimaculatus throughout their entire adult lifetime and measured the impact of sound amplitude, carrier frequency and the temporal pattern of test songs on their auditory response. Females of all ages demonstrated their best responses to male calling songs with a pulse period of 34-42 ms, a carrier frequency of 4.5 kHz and a sound pressure level of 75 dB. The response profile to somewhat less optimal song types did vary with age, but not in a manner consistent with a simple loosening of selectiveness in older females. Age, however, had an effect on the overall strength of phonotaxis, as very old females showed an overall diminishing response to all song types. Our data suggest that although there are minor changes in the relative preferences of crickets to individual song elements as they age, the breadth of song patterns to which they will perform phonotaxis remains similar across age groups.

Indexed as

GryllidaeAdultAgedAnimalsAuditory PerceptionFemaleHumansMaleSoundVocalization, AnimalAcoustic communicationFemale phonotaxisGryllus bimaculatusNo-choice experimentTrack ball

Identifiers

PMID34114627
PMCPMC8214831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.