Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114552›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2021

The Interdisciplinary Management of Newly Diagnosed Pituitary Tumors.

Cornelia Jaursch-Hancke, Timo Deutschbein, Ulrich J Knappe, Wolfgang Saeger, Jörg Flitsch, Martin Fassnacht

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Further Interdisciplinary Considerations.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021
    Article
  8. In Reply.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cornelia Jaursch-HanckeDepartment of Internal Medicine/Endocrinology, DKD Helios Klinik Wiesbaden Medicover Oldenburg MVZ; Department of Internal Medicine I, Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University Hospital, University of; Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; Department of Neurosurgery, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden; Institute of Neuropathology, UKE Hamburg; Department of Neurosurgery, UKE Hamburg.
Timo Deutschbein
Ulrich J Knappe
Wolfgang Saeger
Jörg Flitsch
Martin Fassnacht

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe increasing use of cranial tomographic imaging has led to the more frequent discovery of pituitary tumors. In this review, we discuss the clinical symptoms that point toward a pituitary tumor, the required diagnostic studies, the potential need for follow-up studies, and the indications for neurosurgical treatment.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications from the years 2005-2020 that were retrieved by a selective search in PubMed, as well as on the current German S2k guideline, which was created with the present authors playing a coordinating role, and on further guidelines from abroad. Relevant information from older reviews was also considered.

resultsThe reported prevalence of pituitary tumors varies depending on the method of data acquisition. Autopsy studies yield a figure of 10.7%, while population-based studies reported 77.6-115.6 cases per 100 000 inhabitants. These lesions are nearly always benign, and 85% of them are pituitary adenomas. Pituitary adenomas measuring less than 1 cm in diameter are called microadenomas, while those measuring 1 cm or more are called macroadenomas. According to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies, the prevalence of microadenomas in the general population is in the range of 10-38%, while that of macroadenomas is 0.16-0.3%. Pituitary adenomas can be either hormonally inactive or hormonally active. Half of all patients with hormonally inactive microadenomas display no endocrine abnormality, while 37-85% of patients with hormonally inactive macroadenomas manifest at least partial pituitary insufficiency. The clinical spectrum of pituitary tumors ranges from a fully asymptomatic state to visual disturbances, neurologic deficits, severe hormone excess (e.g., in Cushing disease), and life-threatening pituitary insufficiency. Pituitary adenomas are often diagnosed only after a latency of many years, even when they are symptomatic. If an imaging study shows the tumor to be in contact with the visual pathway, an ophthalmological evaluation should be performed. There are clear indications for surgery, e.g., imminent loss of vision, but most asymptomatic pituitary tumors can be observed only.

conclusionThe manifestations of pituitary tumors are first recognized by primary care physicians. The further diagnostic evaluation of these patients should be carried out in standardized and interdisciplinary fashion.

Indexed as

AdenomaPituitary NeoplasmsFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingVision Disorders

Identifiers

PMID34114552
PMCPMC8283682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.