Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114309›Full record

ArticleJournal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc2022

Youth suicide risk screening in an outpatient child abuse clinic.

Margaret Ngai, Kathleen Delaney, Barbara Limandri, Kristin Dreves, Mary V Tipton, Lisa M Horowitz

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of child and adolescent psychiatric nursing : official publication of the Association of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nurses, Inc, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Measurement Choices for Youth Suicidality.Child psychiatry and human development · 2025
    Review
  3. Suicide Risk Factors in High School Students.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Youth Suicide.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Margaret NgaiDepartment of Community Systems and Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8501-3550
Kathleen DelaneyDepartment of Community Systems and Mental Health Nursing, College of Nursing, Rush University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0668-6026
Barbara LimandriSchool of Nursing, Linfield University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Kristin DrevesSchool of Nursing, Linfield University, Portland, Oregon, USA.
Mary V TiptonNational Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Lisa M HorowitzNational Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Linfield College · USNational Institute of Mental Health · USRush University · US

Funding

Psychiatry Consultation Liaison Service ResearchZIAMH002922 · NIMH · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH · PI PAO, MARYLAND · 2009 to 2025
$11.5M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 MH999999Intramural NIH HHS ZIA MH002922Intramural NIH HHS ZIAMH002922
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

problemChild abuse is an important independent risk factor for suicide. The purpose of the project was to evaluate the implementation of a universal suicide risk screening and assessment tool in an outpatient child abuse evaluation clinic.

methodsParticipants consisted of all patients between the ages of 10 and 18 years who received services at the study site within a 3-month period (n = 162). The study site implemented a tool created for the sole purpose of detecting suicide risk, the Ask Suicide-Screening Questions (ASQ) tool. Data was retrospectively collected using electronic health records; rates of compliance with screening and screen positive rates were calculated.

findingsSuicide risk screening with the ASQ was conducted on 90.7% (147) of the patients. Forty-three (29.2%) patients screened positive for suicide risk. This is a significant increase in detection rates compared to baseline preimplementation data. Of the 67 preteens, 10-12 years of age, that were screened, 14.9% (10/67) screened positive for suicide risk, making up 23% of the positive screens.

conclusionsImplementing a universal suicide risk screening tool was a successful strategy for detecting suicide risk. A quarter of the youth who screened positive on the ASQ were preteens, highlighting the importance of screening the 10- to 12-year olds for suicide risk.

Indexed as

Child AbuseSuicide PreventionAdolescentChildHumansMass ScreeningOutpatientsRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessmentchild abuseoutpatientsuicide risk

Identifiers

PMID34114309
PMCPMC8660926
OpenAlexW3171644442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.