Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114294›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2021

Long-term cognitive and academic outcomes among pediatric brain tumor survivors treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy.

Amanda E Child, Emily A Warren, David R Grosshans, Arnold C Paulino, M Fatih Okcu, M Douglas Ris, Anita Mahajan, Jessica Orobio, Paul T Cirino, Charles G Minard and 5 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Epidemiology of brain and central nervous system cancers in children and adolescents.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Article
  8. Management of late toxicities and specific follow-up needs of adolescent and young adult cancer survivors: recommendations from scientific societies in Spain.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Prospective analysis on possible changes of cognitive functions in children on follow-up for brain tumor.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda E ChildDepartment of Neuropsychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0616-6509
Emily A WarrenDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
David R GrosshansDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Arnold C PaulinoDivision of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0269-3045
M Fatih OkcuDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
M Douglas RisDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Anita MahajanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jessica OrobioDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
Paul T CirinoDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Charles G MinardInstitute for Clinical and Translational Research, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Andres G VianaDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Johanna BickDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Steven P WoodsDepartment of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
Murali ChintagumpalaDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Hematology Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Lisa S KahalleyDepartment of Pediatrics, Section of Psychology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Baylor College of Medicine · USUniversity of Houston · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USKennedy Krieger Institute · USMayo Clinic · USThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · US

Funding

Cognitive Change after Proton RT vs. Photon or Surgery for Pediatric Brain TumorR01CA187202 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KAHALLEY, LISA SCHUM · 2014 to 2019
$2.9M
Neurocognitive Outcomes Following Proton Beam Radiation Therapy for Treatment ofK07CA157923 · NCI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI KAHALLEY, LISA SCHUM · 2011 to 2015
$743k
NCI NIH HHS K07 CA157923NCI NIH HHS R01 CA187202
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProton radiotherapy (PRT) may be associated with less neurocognitive risk than photon RT (XRT) for pediatric brain tumor survivors. We compared neurocognitive and academic outcomes in long-term survivors treated with XRT versus PRT.

methodsSurvivors underwent neurocognitive evaluation >1 year after craniospinal (CSI) or focal PRT or XRT. Groups were compared using separate one-way analyses of covariance for the CSI and focal groups.

resultsPRT (n = 58) and XRT (n = 30) subgroups were similar on gender (66% male), age at RT (median = 6.5 years), age at follow-up (median = 14.6 years), and government assistance status (32%). PRT and XRT focal groups differed on follow-up interval, shunt history, and total RT dose (all p < .05), whereas PRT and XRT CSI groups differed on follow-up interval, baseline neurocognitive performance score, boost volume, and CSI dose (all p < .05). The PRT focal group outperformed the XRT focal group on inhibition/switching (p = .04). The PRT CSI group outperformed the XRT CSI group on inattention/impulsivity (both p < .05). Several clinical variables (i.e., RT dose, boost field, baseline performance) predicted neurocognitive outcomes (all p < .05). The PRT focal group performed comparably to population means on most neurocognitive measures, while both CSI groups performed below expectation on multiple measures. The XRT CSI group was most impaired. All groups fell below expectation on processing speed, fine motor, and academic fluency (most p < .01).

conclusionsFindings suggest generally favorable neurocognitive and academic long-term outcomes following focal PRT. Impairment was greatest following CSI regardless of modality. Dosimetry and baseline characteristics are important determinants of outcome alone or in combination with modality.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsCognitionProton TherapyCancer SurvivorsChildFemaleHumansMalePhotonsacademicbrain tumorneurocognitivepediatricradiation

Identifiers

PMID34114294
PMCPMC8316321
OpenAlexW3166521908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.