ArticleUpdates in surgery2021
Comparison of two different surgical strategies for breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy plus sentinel lymph node biopsy.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Axillary Lymph Node Dissection Through a Separate Incision Does Not Increase Rates of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema.Annals of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Mean platelet volume may not decrease in patients with acute appendicitis.Updates in surgery · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two separated incisions are generally adopted in breast cancer patients treated by mastectomy plus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). However, one-incision procedure is also applied in clinical practice. The outcomes of the two different surgical strategies remain unknown. This issue needs to be investigated. The medical records of breast cancer patients who underwent a mastectomy combined with an SLNB were reviewed retrospectively. Group A comprised patients who received a single incision for both the mastectomy and SLNB. Group B comprised patients who received a second incision for the SLNB. Demographics and outcomes were compared between the two groups. There were 280 female patients divided into Groups A (n = 130) and B (n = 150) included in this study. Preoperatively, the two groups were similar in demographics for age, tumor size, tumor location, body mass index, pathologic type, and cancer stage (P > 0.05). Group A showed shorter surgical times (129.5 ± 29.0 vs. 136.7 ± 21.9 min), less postoperative upper limb numbness (12.3% vs. 25.3%), and more harvested sentinel lymph nodes (3.2 ± 1.1 vs. 2.7 ± 1.0) than Group B (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences for intraoperative blood loss, total postoperative drainage amount, hospital stay, upper limb motility, upper limb pain, upper limb edema, number of metastatic sentinel lymph nodes, follow-up time, or recurrent cases (P > 0.05). The one-incision approach for a breast cancer mastectomy plus SLNB has several advantages over the two-incision approach, including a shorter surgical time, decreased upper limb numbness, and the harvesting of more sentinel lymph nodes. Further prospective randomized controlled clinical trials should be designed to verify the current findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34114199What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.