ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2021
Predictive online 3D target tracking with population-based generative networks for image-guided radiotherapy.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Modeling of artificial intelligence-based respiratory motion prediction in MRI-guided radiotherapy: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2024Review
- Current Research Status of Respiratory Motion for Thorax and Abdominal Treatment: A Systematic Review.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Modern Image-Guided Surgery: A Narrative Review of Medical Image Processing and Visualization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- A novel bone suppression algorithm in intensity-based 2D/3D image registration for real-time tumor motion monitoring: Development and phantom-based validation.Medical physics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeRespiratory motion of thoracic organs poses a severe challenge for the administration of image-guided radiotherapy treatments. Providing online and up-to-date volumetric information during free breathing can improve target tracking, ultimately increasing treatment efficiency and reducing toxicity to surrounding healthy tissue. In this work, a novel population-based generative network is proposed to address the problem of 3D target location prediction from 2D image-based surrogates during radiotherapy, thus enabling out-of-plane tracking of treatment targets using images acquired in real time.
methodsThe proposed model is trained to simultaneously create a low-dimensional manifold representation of 3D non-rigid deformations and to predict, ahead of time, the motion of the treatment target. The predictive capabilities of the model allow correcting target location errors that can arise due to system latency, using only a baseline volume of the patient anatomy. Importantly, the method does not require supervised information such as ground-truth registration fields, organ segmentation, or anatomical landmarks.
resultsThe proposed architecture was evaluated on both free-breathing 4D MRI and ultrasound datasets. Potential challenges present in a realistic therapy, like different acquisition protocols, were taken into account by using an independent hold-out test set. Our approach enables 3D target tracking from single-view slices with a mean landmark error of 1.8 mm, 2.4 mm and 5.2 mm in volunteer MRI, patient MRI and US datasets, respectively, without requiring any prior subject-specific 4D acquisition.
conclusionsThis model presents several advantages over state-of-the-art approaches. Namely, it benefits from an explainable latent space with explicit respiratory phase discrimination. Thanks to the strong generalization capabilities of neural networks, it does not require establishing inter-subject correspondences. Once trained, it can be quickly deployed with an inference time of only 8 ms. The results show the capability of the network to predict future anatomical changes and track tumors in real time, yielding statistically significant improvements over related methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.