Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114159›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2022

Effects of tetracycline antibiotics in chicken manure on soil microbes and antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs).

Longshui Xu, Weizhong Wang, Weihong Xu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Antibiotic resistance dissemination in soil ecosystems: deep understanding for effective management and global health protection.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Role of Grass Compost andInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Longshui XuCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Weizhong WangCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China.
Weihong XuCollege of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing, 400715, People's Republic of China. xuwei_hong@163.com.
Southwest University · CN

Funding

Agriculture Research System of China CARS-23Key Technologies Research and Development Program 2018YFD0201200
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

China is the world's largest livestock and poultry breeding country, but also the largest use of veterinary antibiotics. When a large amount of chicken manure is applied to the soil, it will cause the number of antibiotic residues and resistant bacteria to increase, which will bring about the pollution of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the soil, and then increase the risk of environmental pollution and human health. Field experiments were conducted to study the changes of soil tetracycline antibiotic residues, resistant bacteria and resistance genes treated with different types and dosage of chicken manure (no chicken manure, (CK), low fresh chicken manure treatment (300 kg·667 m

Indexed as

ManureSoilAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensDrug Resistance, MicrobialHumansSoil MicrobiologyTetracyclinesAnti-Bacterial AgentsManureSoilTetracyclinesAntibiotic resistance genes (ARGs)Chicken manureSoil enzyme activitySoil microbesTetracycline antibiotics

Identifiers

PMID34114159
OpenAlexW3170306401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.