Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114156›Full record

ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2022

Gender Differences in Colonoscopy: Implications for Clinical Practice and Female Gastroenterologists.

Karin L Andersson, Jasmine B Ha, Diane R Abraczinskas, Emily J Campbell, James M Richter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Sex-Specific Outcomes after a Negative Colonoscopy in the Finnish Randomized Health Service Study during 2004 to 2016.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Karin L AnderssonDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA. kandersson@mgh.harvard.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-8497-1335
Jasmine B HaDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
Diane R AbraczinskasDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
Emily J CampbellDepartment of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.
James M RichterDivision of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsPerforming colonoscopy can be technically challenging in female patients. Female patients may prefer having a female endoscopist. This preference, coupled with the fact that there are fewer female endoscopists, may result in gender differences in colonoscopy practice. We hypothesized that the duration of female colonoscopy is longer and that female endoscopists perform a higher proportion of female colonoscopy than male colleagues. We explored the potential revenue implications of gender differences in screening colonoscopy.

methodsWe analyzed procedure time and gender differences in 16,573 screening colonoscopies performed by 27 male and 7 female endoscopists over a three-year period in one large academic practice. We modeled the potential revenue impacts of differences in procedure duration, proportion of female colonoscopy and the frequency of detected adenomas.

resultsWe found that screening colonoscopy takes 8.8% more time to complete in female patients compared to male patients for all endoscopists (p < 0.001), and that female endoscopists perform an average of 71.2% female exams compared to male endoscopists, who perform an average of 50.8% female exams (p < 0.001). Female patients had a lower detection adenoma rate (ADR), reducing the frequency of polypectomy and reimbursement in an RVU model. The observed gender differences could account for an estimated 9.6% revenue loss per 8-h session for a female gastroenterologist performing screening colonoscopy compared to a male counterpart.

conclusionLonger colonoscopy duration in females, increased proportion of female colonoscopies for female endoscopists and lower ADR in females may contribute to the gender gap in physician pay in gastroenterology.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsGastroenterologistsColonoscopyEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleSex FactorsColonoscopyFemale colonoscopyGenderGender pay gap

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.