ReviewMolecular biology reports2021
Genetically modified crop regulations: scope and opportunity using the CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing approach.
Review in Molecular biology reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Public perception of new plant breeding techniques and the psychosocial determinants of acceptance: A systematic review.Public understanding of science (Bristol, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Molecular mechanisms and agronomic strategies for thermotolerance in chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.).Plant cell reports · 2026Review
- Review
- Strategies to develop climate-resilient chili peppers: transcription factor optimization through genome editing.Planta · 2025Review
- An accelerated transgene-free genome editing system using microparticle bombardment of sorghum immature embryos.aBIOTECH · 2025Article
- Virus-Induced Genome Editing (VIGE): One Step Away from an Agricultural Revolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Genetic Engineering for Cereal Crop Yield Improvement and Disease Resistant Breeding.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2025Review
- An AI-driven framework for enhancing regulatory precision and efficiency in CRISPR-Cas gene-edited crops: challenges, opportunities, and global harmonization.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Knockout ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Advancements in genetic studies of mushrooms: a comprehensive review.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Review
- A review on regulatory aspects, challenges and public perception in acceptance of genetically modified foods.Food science and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Revolutionizing Agriculture: Harnessing CRISPR/Cas9 for Crop Enhancement.Indian journal of microbiology · 2024Review
- CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Therapy for Glioblastoma: A Scoping Review.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Processes for regulating genetically modified and gene edited plants.GM crops & food · 2023Review
- The current scenario and future perspectives of transgenic oilseed mustard by CRISPR-Cas9.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- Genetic modification strategies for enhancing plant resilience to abiotic stresses in the context of climate change.Functional & integrative genomics · 2023Review
- Multiplex CRISPR-Cas9 Gene-Editing Can Deliver Potato Cultivars with Reduced Browning and Acrylamide.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Strategies for delivery of CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing to obtain edited plants directly without transgene integration.Frontiers in genome editing · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Global demand for food is increasing day by day due to an increase in population and shrinkage of the arable land area. To meet this increasing demand, there is a need to develop high-yielding varieties that are nutritionally enriched and tolerant against environmental stresses. Various techniques are developed for improving crop quality such as mutagenesis, intergeneric crosses, and translocation breeding. Later, with the development of genetic engineering, genetically modified crops came up with the transgene insertion approach which helps to withstand adverse conditions. The process or product-focused approaches are used for regulating genetically modified crops with their risk analysis on the environment and public health. However, recent advances in gene-editing technologies have led to a new era of plant breeding by developing techniques including site-directed nucleases, zinc finger nucleases, and the clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) that involve precise gene editing without the transfer of foreign genes. But these techniques always remain in debate for their regulation status and public acceptance. The European countries and New Zealand, consider the gene-edited plants under the category of genetically modified organism (GMO) regulation while the USA frees the gene-edited plants from such type of regulations. Considering them under the category of GMO makes a long and complicated approval process to use them, which would decrease their immediate commercial value. There is a need to develop strong regulatory approaches for emerging technologies that expedite crop research and attract people to adopt these new varieties without hesitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34114124What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.