ArticleArchives of microbiology2021
Growth of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens as influence by Si nutrition.
Article in Archives of microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biostimulant Activity of Silicate Compounds and Antagonistic Bacteria on Physiological Growth Enhancement and Resistance of Banana toPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of study was to determine the influence of soluble and solid forms of Si on the growth of B. amyloliquefaciens. The experiment was conducted at two regimes: under sterile conditions (without B. amyloliquefaciens) and infected conditions (with B. amyloliquefaciens). New formed silica gel, diatomite and monosilicic acid at 1 mM Si and 2 mM Si were used as source of Si. The concentration of monosilicic acid in the solution was measured on second and tenth days of experiment. The total carbon in the solution before and after centrifugation was determined on day 10 of the experiment. The experiment has demonstrated a significant positive effect (by 4.7-41.2%) on B. amyloliquefaciens growth in water system. The presence of B. amyloliquefaciens in Si-rich solution reduced the concentration of monosilicic acid in the solution up to 16.2%. About 13.5-30.7% of B. amyloliquefaciens can be attached to the Si-rich surface without formation of cell clusters. Si can be classified as a beneficial nutrient for B. amyloliquefaciens. The tested strain of Bacillus can form channels in silica gel. The presence of monosilicic acid resulted in the formation of an aligned positioning of cells in water-based solution. This study is the first to demonstrate the direct influence of active Si forms on bacteria growth. The research showed that monosilicic acid or Si-rich solid substances with high solubility on Si can be recommended to increase B. amyloliquefaciens growth in soil, water or reactors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.