Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34114076›Full record

ArticleInsights into imaging2021

T-staging pulmonary oncology from radiological reports using natural language processing: translating into a multi-language setting.

J Martijn Nobel, Sander Puts, Jakob Weiss, Hugo J W L Aerts, Raymond H Mak, Simon G F Robben, André L A J Dekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insights into imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Knowledge Graph and Deep Learning-based Text-to-GQL Model for Intelligent Medical Consultation Chatbot.Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

J Martijn Nobel *Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. martijn.nobel@mumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3379-7290
Sander Puts *Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Jakob WeissArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Hugo J W L AertsDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Raymond H MakArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIM) Program, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.
Simon G F RobbenDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Postbox 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
André L A J DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the era of datafication, it is important that medical data are accurate and structured for multiple applications. Especially data for oncological staging need to be accurate to stage and treat a patient, as well as population-level surveillance and outcome assessment. To support data extraction from free-text radiological reports, Dutch natural language processing (NLP) algorithm was built to quantify T-stage of pulmonary tumors according to the tumor node metastasis (TNM) classification. This structuring tool was translated and validated on English radiological free-text reports. A rule-based algorithm to classify T-stage was trained and validated on, respectively, 200 and 225 English free-text radiological reports from diagnostic computed tomography (CT) obtained for staging of patients with lung cancer. The automated T-stage extracted by the algorithm from the report was compared to manual staging. A graphical user interface was built for training purposes to visualize the results of the algorithm by highlighting the extracted concepts and its modifying context.

resultsAccuracy of the T-stage classifier was 0.89 in the validation set, 0.84 when considering the T-substages, and 0.76 when only considering tumor size. Results were comparable with the Dutch results (respectively, 0.88, 0.89 and 0.79). Most errors were made due to ambiguity issues that could not be solved by the rule-based nature of the algorithm.

conclusionsNLP can be successfully applied for staging lung cancer from free-text radiological reports in different languages. Focused introduction of machine learning should be introduced in a hybrid approach to improve performance.

Indexed as

Classification systemFree-textNatural language processingRadiologyReporting

Identifiers

PMID34114076
PMCPMC8192634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.