Empiric ablation of asymptomatic PVCs when there is greater than 20% burden but normal left ventricular function-An argument in support of catheter ablation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Catheter ablation for idiopathic premature ventricular complexes: a single-centre experience.The British journal of cardiology · 2026
   Article
2. Electrophysiological characteristics and catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias arising from the superior septal left ventricle.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024
   Article
3. Best ablation strategy in patients with premature ventricular contractions with multiple morphology: a single-centre experience.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
   Observational

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as