Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34113915›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22021

Utilization and programming of an automatic MRI recognition feature for cardiac rhythm management devices.

Steven Mullane, Kyle Michaelis, Charles Henrikson, Sei Iwai, Crystal Miller, Camden Harrell, David Hayes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: the RESONANCE Spanish registry.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Steven MullaneBIOTRONIK, Lake Oswego, Oregon.
Kyle MichaelisSacramento Heart, Sacramento, California.
Charles HenriksonKnight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Sei IwaiWestchester Medical Center Health Network, Valhalla, New York.
Crystal MillerBIOTRONIK, Lake Oswego, Oregon.
Camden HarrellBIOTRONIK, Lake Oswego, Oregon.
David HayesBIOTRONIK, Lake Oswego, Oregon.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED)-ie, pacemakers, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy devices-have recently been designed to allow for patients to safely undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) when specific programming is implemented. MRI AutoDetect is a feature that automatically switches CIED's programming into and out of an MR safe mode when exposed to an MRI environment.

objectiveThe purpose was to analyze de-identified daily remote transmission data to characterize the utilization of the MRI AutoDetect feature.

methodsHome Monitoring transmission data collected from MRI AutoDetect-capable devices were retrospectively analyzed to determine the workflow and usage in patients experiencing an MRI using the MRI AutoDetect feature.

resultsAmong 48,756 capable systems, 2197 devices underwent an MRI using the MRI AutoDetect feature. In these 2197 devices, the MRI AutoDetect feature was used a total of 2806 times with an average MRI exposure of 40.83 minutes. The majority (88.9%) of MRI exposures occurred on the same day as the MRI AutoDetect programming. A same day post-MRI exposure follow-up device interrogation was performed 8.6% of the time. A device-related complaint occurred within 30 days of the MRI exposure in 0.25% of MRI exposures using MRI AutoDetect but with no adverse clinical outcome.

conclusionAs a result of automation in device programming, the MRI AutoDetect feature eliminated post-MRI device reprogramming in 91.4% of MRI exposures and, while less frequent, allowed for pre-MRI interrogations prior to the day of the MRI exposure-reducing resource utilization and creating workflow flexibility.

Indexed as

AutomationDefibrillatorDevice programmingMagnetic resonance imagingMRI-conditionalMRI detectionPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID34113915
PMCPMC8183951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.