Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34113902›Full record

ArticleHeart rhythm O22021

Catheter ablation and healthcare utilization and cost among patients with paroxysmal versus persistent atrial fibrillation.

Daniel J Friedman, Michael E Field, Motiur Rahman, Laura Goldstein, Qun Sha, M Sidharth, Rahul Khanna, Jonathan P Piccini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heart rhythm O2, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Variation and clinical consequences of wait-times for atrial fibrillation ablation: population level study in Ontario, Canada.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniel J FriedmanSection of Cardiac Electrophysiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Michael E FieldDepartment of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Motiur RahmanJohnson and Johnson, Medical Device Epidemiology, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Laura GoldsteinJohnson and Johnson, Franchise Health Economics and Market Access, Irvine, California.
Qun ShaBiosense Webster Inc, Franchise Medical Affairs, Irvine, California.
M SidharthMuSigma Inc, Bengaluru, India.
Rahul KhannaJohnson and Johnson, Medical Device Epidemiology, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Jonathan P PicciniElectrophysiology Section, Duke University Hospital & Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAblation reduces atrial fibrillation (AF) burden and improves health-related quality of life. The relationship between ablation, healthcare utilization, and AF type (paroxysmal AF [PAF] vs persistent AF [PsAF]) remains unclear.

objectiveTo compare changes in AF-related healthcare utilization and costs from preablation to postablation among patients with PAF and PsAF.

methodsPatients (2794 PAF, 1909 PsAF) undergoing ablation (2016-2018) were identified using the Optum database. Outcomes included inpatient admissions, emergency department (ED) visits, office visits, cardioversion, and antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) use. Costs (2018 US$) and outcomes were compared for the year before/after ablation using the McNemar test and Wilcoxon signed rank test.

resultsCompared to PAF patients, PsAF patients were older (68.6 ± 9.0 years vs 67.4 ± 9.9 years,

conclusionSignificant reductions in healthcare utilization and costs were observed among PAF and PsAF patients undergoing ablation. These data suggest a strategy of earlier ablation may reduce long-term healthcare utilization and costs.

Indexed as

AblationAtrial fibrillationCostHealthcare economicsHealthcare utilization

Identifiers

PMID34113902
PMCPMC8183841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.