Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34113681›Full record

ReviewBioMed research international2021

Imaging Assessment of the Postoperative Spine: An Updated Pictorial Review of Selected Complications.

Roberto Corona-Cedillo, Melanie-Tessa Saavedra-Navarrete, Juan-Jose Espinoza-Garcia, Alexela-Nerey Mendoza-Aguilar, Sergey K Ternovoy, Ernesto Roldan-Valadez

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BioMed research international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Interpreting acute postoperative MRI after lumbar spinal fusion: a practical framework for clinical decision-making.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Review
  2. Pre-scan prediction of postoperative MRI reliability for the spinal canal and neural foramina using localizer images in patients with lumbar instrumentation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Clinical MR imaging of patients with spinal hardware at 0.55T: comparison of diagnostic assessment and metal artifact appearance with 1.5T.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberto Corona-CedilloNeuroimaging Department, National Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-5755
Melanie-Tessa Saavedra-NavarreteFacultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Anahuac Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8723-5504
Juan-Jose Espinoza-GarciaFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Autónoma de Coahuila, Torreo City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5207-9089
Alexela-Nerey Mendoza-AguilarDirectorate of Research, Hospital General de Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1437-3740
Sergey K TernovoyDepartment of Radiology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 119992 Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4374-1063
Ernesto Roldan-ValadezDirectorate of Research, Hospital General de Mexico "Dr. Eduardo Liceaga", Mexico City, Mexico.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7116-5289
Sechenov University · RUHospital General de México · MXInstituto Nacional de Neurología y Neurocirugía · MXUniversidad Anáhuac · MXUniversidad Autónoma de Coahuila · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Imaging of the postoperative spine requires the identification of several critical points by the radiologist to be written in the medical report: condition of the underlying cortical and cancellous bone, intervertebral disc, and musculoskeletal tissues; location and integrity of surgical implants; evaluation of the success of decompression procedures; delineation of fusion status; and identification of complications. This article presents a pictorial narrative review of the most common findings observed in

Indexed as

HumansIntervertebral DiscIntervertebral Disc DegenerationIntervertebral Disc DisplacementPostoperative ComplicationsPostoperative PeriodSpinal Fusion

Identifiers

PMID34113681
PMCPMC8154286
OpenAlexW3160171094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.