ArticleCureus2021
Helicobacter Pylori Eradication Therapy: Still a Challenge.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of Enterococcus faecium 129 BIO 3B-R on Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy side effects in adult patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Helicobacter pylori eradication rates using clarithromycin and levofloxacin-based regimens in patients with previous COVID-19 treatment: a randomized clinical trial.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Trial
- Comparable tolerability, symptom worsening, and treatment completion rates among different Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens in children.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Clinical impact of high-dose esomeprazole-amoxicillin dual therapy as rescue treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Gut pathogens · 2026Review
- Comparative Efficacy of Triple Versus Quadruple Therapy for the Eradication ofJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025Review
- Anti-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Using Caprylic Acid for the Prevention and Treatment ofMetabolites · 2025Review
- Comparative efficacy and safety of vonoprazan versus esomeprazole-based high-dose dual therapies for first-lineTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Comparative Assessment of the Anti-Cells · 2024Article
- Article
- Novel therapeutic regimens againstFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Article
- Article
- The Effectiveness of Different Eradication Schemes for PediatricChildren (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Scope and Limitations of Current Antibiotic Therapies againstPharmaceutics · 2022Review
- The Efficacy of Probiotics in the Management of Helicobacter Pylori: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is prevalent worldwide. H. pylori therapies' adverse effects can contribute to noncompliance among patients. This study aimed to assess the association between compliance to H. pylori eradication therapy and adverse effects using various drug regimens. Method We conducted an observational study from September 2017 to February 2020 in two tertiary care hospitals in patients with dyspeptic symptoms. H. Pylori detection was done by histopathological examination of gastric mucosa during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy or stool for H. pylori antigen. Patients with positive results were randomly assigned one of the nine different regimens consisting of a combination of proton pump inhibitors along with at least two antibiotics. The antibiotics used in different combinations were amoxicillin, clarithromycin, metronidazole, doxycycline, levofloxacin, and bismuth sulfate. The treatment groups received standard triple therapy with and without probiotics, sequential, concomitant, levofloxacin-based triple therapy, or sequential and bismuth-based quadruple treatments. All treatments were given for two weeks. At the end of the treatment period, patients were interviewed about completing treatment and any adverse effects they may have experienced during therapy. Data were analyzed using IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0 (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.). Results A total of 250 patients were included in the study (62% males, 38% females) with a mean age of 37 years ± 13 years (range 12-84 years). Most patients completed the treatment regimen (80.4%), and 19.6% did not complete treatment because of adverse effects (p<0.005). The levofloxacin-based, concomitant, and standard triple regimen with probiotic treatments had the highest tolerance (≥85%). Common adverse effects were abdominal and epigastric pain (11%), alteration of taste, and diarrhea (6.5%). Conclusion H. pylori eradication therapy is always a challenge. Patient compliance to the treatment can only be ensured by medicines with fewer adverse effects. In our study, levofloxacin-based triple, concomitant, and standard triple regimens with probiotics are maximally acceptable treatments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.