Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34113084›Full record

ArticlePatient preference and adherence2021

"Passing Out is a Serious Thing": Patient Expectations for Syncope Evaluation and Management.

Jessica Miller Clouser, Matthew Sirrine, Colleen A McMullen, Amy M Cowley, Susan S Smyth, Vedant Gupta, Mark V Williams, Jing Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. 'Communication Is Crucial': A Qualitative Study of Patient Expectations of Diagnostic Tests in Emergency Medicine Practice.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  2. 'BMJ open · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jessica Miller ClouserCenter for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4064-8277
Matthew SirrineCenter for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Colleen A McMullenGill Heart & Vascular Institute, UK HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Amy M CowleyCenter for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Susan S SmythGill Heart & Vascular Institute, UK HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.
Vedant GuptaGill Heart & Vascular Institute, UK HealthCare, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0739-153X
Mark V WilliamsCenter for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.
Jing LiCenter for Health Services Research, College of Medicine, Lexington, KY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3433-5661

Funding

Project MISSION: Developing a multicomponent, Multilevel Implementation Strategy for Syncope OptImalCare thrOugh eNgagementU01HL143508 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI LI, JING, WILLIAMS, MARK V · 2018 to 2019
$1.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL143508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSyncope is a complex symptom requiring thoughtful evaluation. The ACC/AHA/HRS published syncope management guidelines in 2017. Effective guideline implementation hinges on overcoming multilevel barriers, including providers' perceptions that patients prefer aggressive diagnostic testing when presenting to the emergency department (ED) with syncope, which conflicts with the 2017 Guideline on Syncope. To better understand this perceived barrier, we explored patient and family caregiver expectations and preferences when presenting to the ED with syncope. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe conducted semi-structured focus groups (N=12) and in-depth interviews (N=19) with patients presenting to the ED with syncope as well as with their family caregivers. Interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed by a team of researchers following a directed content analysis. Results were reviewed and shared iteratively with all team members to confirm mutual understanding and agreement.

resultsSyncope patients and caregivers discussed three main desires when presenting to the ED with syncope: 1) clarity regarding their diagnosis,; 2) context surrounding their care plan and diagnostic approach; and 3) to feel seen, heard and cared about by their health care team.

conclusionClinicians have cited patient preferences for aggressive diagnostic testing as a barrier to adhering to the 2017 Guideline on Syncope, which recommends against routine administration of imaging testing (eg, echocardiograms). Our results suggest that while participants preferred diagnostic testing as a means to achieve clarity and even a feeling of being cared for, other strategies, such as a patient-engaged approach to communication and shared decision-making, may address the spectrum of patient expectations when presenting to the ED with syncope while adhering to guideline recommendations.

Indexed as

implementation sciencepatientsstatements and guidelines

Identifiers

PMID34113084
PMCPMC8187096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.