Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112949›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of cancer2021

Cancer immunotherapy: it's time to better predict patients' response.

Charlotte Pilard, Marie Ancion, Philippe Delvenne, Guy Jerusalem, Pascale Hubert, Michael Herfs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of cancer, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
124citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

124 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Dual-time-point [EJNMMI research · 2026
    Article
  9. Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Genetic landscape of cancer: mechanisms, key genes, and therapeutic implications.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. CCR2Discovery immunology · 2026
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlotte Pilard *Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Marie Ancion *Laboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Philippe DelvenneLaboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Guy JerusalemDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Pascale HubertLaboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium.
Michael HerfsLaboratory of Experimental Pathology, GIGA-Cancer, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium. M.Herfs@uliege.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4382-8997

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In less than a decade, half a dozen immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved and are currently revolutionising the treatment of many cancer (sub)types. With the clinical evaluation of novel delivery approaches (e.g. oncolytic viruses, cancer vaccines, natural killer cell-mediated cytotoxicity) and combination therapies (e.g. chemo/radio-immunotherapy) as well as the emergence of novel promising targets (e.g. TIGIT, LAG-3, TIM-3), the 'immunotherapy tsunami' is not about to end anytime soon. However, this enthusiasm in the field is somewhat tempered by both the relatively low percentage (<15%) of patients who display an effective anti-cancer immune response and the inability to accurately identify them. Recently, several existing or acquired features/parameters have been shown to impact the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In the present review, we critically discuss current knowledge regarding predictive biomarkers for checkpoint inhibitor-based immunotherapy, highlight the missing/unclear links and emphasise the importance of characterising each neoplasm and its microenvironment in order to better guide the course of treatment.

Indexed as

Cancer VaccinesHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsImmunotherapyKiller Cells, NaturalNeoplasmsOncolytic VirotherapyCancer VaccinesImmune Checkpoint Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID34112949
PMCPMC8476530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.