Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112934›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2021

High-frequency burst spiking in layer 5 thick-tufted pyramids of rat primary somatosensory cortex encodes exploratory touch.

Christiaan P J de Kock, Jean Pie, Anton W Pieneman, Rebecca A Mease, Arco Bast, Jason M Guest, Marcel Oberlaender, Huibert D Mansvelder, Bert Sakmann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Distinct laminar origins of sensory-evoked high-gamma and low-frequency ECoG signals revealed by optogenetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Transthalamic Pathways for Cortical Function.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. iScience · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Christiaan P J de KockDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. ckock@falw.vu.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-6697-0179
Jean PieDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2003-3999
Anton W PienemanDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Rebecca A MeaseInstitute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Arco BastMax Planck Group: In Silico Brain Sciences, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany.
Jason M GuestMax Planck Group: In Silico Brain Sciences, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany.
Marcel OberlaenderMax Planck Group: In Silico Brain Sciences, Center of Advanced European Studies and Research, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9011-0630
Huibert D MansvelderDepartment of Integrative Neurophysiology, Center for Neurogenomics and Cognitive Research, Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam, VU, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1365-5340
Bert SakmannMax Planck Institute for Neurobiology, Martinsried, Germany.
Amsterdam Neuroscience · NLCenter of Advanced European Studies and Research · DEHeidelberg University · DEMax Planck Institute of Neurobiology · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diversity of cell-types that collectively shape the cortical microcircuit ensures the necessary computational richness to orchestrate a wide variety of behaviors. The information content embedded in spiking activity of identified cell-types remain unclear to a large extent. Here, we recorded spike responses upon whisker touch of anatomically identified excitatory cell-types in primary somatosensory cortex in naive, untrained rats. We find major differences across layers and cell-types. The temporal structure of spontaneous spiking contains high-frequency bursts (≥100 Hz) in all morphological cell-types but a significant increase upon whisker touch is restricted to layer L5 thick-tufted pyramids (L5tts) and thus provides a distinct neurophysiological signature. We find that whisker touch can also be decoded from L5tt bursting, but not from other cell-types. We observed high-frequency bursts in L5tts projecting to different subcortical regions, including thalamus, midbrain and brainstem. We conclude that bursts in L5tts allow accurate coding and decoding of exploratory whisker touch.

Indexed as

TouchAction PotentialsAnimalsMaleNeuronsRatsRats, WistarSomatosensory CortexVibrissae

Identifiers

PMID34112934
PMCPMC8192911
OpenAlexW3166154691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.