Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112848›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Social Network Research contribution to evaluating process in a feasibility study of a peer-led and school-based sexual health intervention.

Chiara Broccatelli, Peng Wang, Lisa McDaid, Mark McCann, Sharon Anne Simpson, Lawrie Elliott, Laurence Moore, Kirstin Mitchell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara BroccatelliInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. c.broccatelli@edu.uq.au.
Peng WangCentre for Transformative Innovation, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Lisa McDaidInstitute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Mark McCannMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Sharon Anne SimpsonMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lawrie ElliottDepartment of Nursing and Community Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Laurence MooreMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Kirstin MitchellMRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit · GBUniversity of Queensland · AUGlasgow Caledonian University · GBSwinburne University of Technology · AUUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office SPHSU11Chief Scientist Office SPHSU14Chief Scientist Office SPHSU16Chief Scientist Office SPHSU18Medical Research Council MC/PC/13027Medical Research Council MC_PC_13027Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00022/3Medical Research Council MC_UU_12017/14Wellcome Trust 307616–01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing interest in social network-based programmes to improve health, but rigorous methods using Social Network research to evaluate the process of these interventions is less well developed. Using data from the "STis And Sexual Health" (STASH) feasibility trial of a school-based, peer-led intervention on sexual health prevention, we illustrate how network data analysis results can address key components of process evaluations for complex interventions-implementation, mechanisms of impacts, and context. STASH trained students as Peer Supporters (PS) to diffuse sexual health messages though face-to-face interactions and online Facebook (FB) groups. We applied a Multilevel Exponential Random Graph modelling approach to analyse the interdependence between offline friendship relationships and online FB ties and how these different relationships align. Our results suggest that the creation of online FB communities mirrored offline adolescent groups, demonstrating fidelity of intervention delivery. Data on informal friendship networks related to student's individual characteristics (i.e., demographics, sexual health knowledge and adherence to norms, which were included for STASH), contributed to an understanding of the social relational 'building' mechanisms that sustain tie-formation. This knowledge could assist the selection of opinion leaders, improving identification of influential peers situated in optimal network positions. This work provides a novel contribution to understanding how to integrate network research with the process evaluation of a network intervention.

Indexed as

Peer GroupSchoolsSexual HealthSocial NetworkingSocial SupportAdolescentEarly Intervention, EducationalFemaleFriendsHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalStudents

Identifiers

PMID34112848
PMCPMC8192897
OpenAlexW3168043049

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.