Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112829›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Automated scoring of pre-REM sleep in mice with deep learning.

Niklas Grieger, Justus T C Schwabedal, Stefanie Wendel, Yvonne Ritze, Stephan Bialonski

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. REST-a deep learning tool for automated mouse sleep stage classification.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SleepInvestigatoR: a flexible R function for analyzing scored sleep in rodents.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Probability estimation of narcolepsy type 1 in DTA mice using unlabeled EEG and EMG data.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Niklas GriegerDepartment of Medical Engineering and Technomathematics, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Jülich, 52428, Germany.
Justus T C SchwabedalIndependent researcher, Kottbusser Damm 35, Berlin, 10967, Germany.
Stefanie WendelDepartment of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Yvonne RitzeDepartment of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Neurobiology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
Stephan BialonskiDepartment of Medical Engineering and Technomathematics, FH Aachen University of Applied Sciences, Jülich, 52428, Germany. bialonski@fh-aachen.de.
University of Tübingen · DEFH Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable automation of the labor-intensive manual task of scoring animal sleep can facilitate the analysis of long-term sleep studies. In recent years, deep-learning-based systems, which learn optimal features from the data, increased scoring accuracies for the classical sleep stages of Wake, REM, and Non-REM. Meanwhile, it has been recognized that the statistics of transitional stages such as pre-REM, found between Non-REM and REM, may hold additional insight into the physiology of sleep and are now under vivid investigation. We propose a classification system based on a simple neural network architecture that scores the classical stages as well as pre-REM sleep in mice. When restricted to the classical stages, the optimized network showed state-of-the-art classification performance with an out-of-sample F1 score of 0.95 in male C57BL/6J mice. When unrestricted, the network showed lower F1 scores on pre-REM (0.5) compared to the classical stages. The result is comparable to previous attempts to score transitional stages in other species such as transition sleep in rats or N1 sleep in humans. Nevertheless, we observed that the sequence of predictions including pre-REM typically transitioned from Non-REM to REM reflecting sleep dynamics observed by human scorers. Our findings provide further evidence for the difficulty of scoring transitional sleep stages, likely because such stages of sleep are under-represented in typical data sets or show large inter-scorer variability. We further provide our source code and an online platform to run predictions with our trained network.

Indexed as

Deep LearningModels, TheoreticalSleep, REMSleep StagesAlgorithmsAnimalsMicePolysomnographySleep

Identifiers

PMID34112829
PMCPMC8192905
OpenAlexW3159906646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.