Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112806›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Cell segmentation-free inference of cell types from in situ transcriptomics data.

Jeongbin Park, Wonyl Choi, Sebastian Tiesmeyer, Brian Long, Lars E Borm, Emma Garren, Thuc Nghi Nguyen, Bosiljka Tasic, Simone Codeluppi, Tobias Graf and 4 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 77 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Spatial architecture of development and disease.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Spatial omics for profiling the dynamic tumor microenvironment.Clinical & translational immunology · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Cancer therapy resistance from a spatial-omics perspective.Clinical and translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jeongbin Park *Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Digital Health Center, Kapelle-Ufer 2, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Wonyl Choi *Department of Computer Science, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Sebastian TiesmeyerBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Digital Health Center, Kapelle-Ufer 2, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Brian LongAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-5969
Lars E BormDivision of molecular neurobiology, Department of medical biochemistry and biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Emma GarrenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.
Thuc Nghi NguyenAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6466-5883
Bosiljka TasicAllen Institute for Brain Science, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6861-4506
Simone CodeluppiDivision of molecular neurobiology, Department of medical biochemistry and biophysics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7053-0520
Tobias GrafBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Digital Health Center, Kapelle-Ufer 2, 10117, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias SchlesnerBioinformatics and Omics Data Analytics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-4086
Oliver StegleDivision of Computational Genomics and System Genetics, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Roland EilsBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Digital Health Center, Kapelle-Ufer 2, 10117, Berlin, Germany. roland.eils@bih-charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0034-4036
Naveed IshaqueBerlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Digital Health Center, Kapelle-Ufer 2, 10117, Berlin, Germany. naveed.ishaque@bih-charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-901X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiplexed fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques have enabled cell-type identification, linking transcriptional heterogeneity with spatial heterogeneity of cells. However, inaccurate cell segmentation reduces the efficacy of cell-type identification and tissue characterization. Here, we present a method called Spot-based Spatial cell-type Analysis by Multidimensional mRNA density estimation (SSAM), a robust cell segmentation-free computational framework for identifying cell-types and tissue domains in 2D and 3D. SSAM is applicable to a variety of in situ transcriptomics techniques and capable of integrating prior knowledge of cell types. We apply SSAM to three mouse brain tissue images: the somatosensory cortex imaged by osmFISH, the hypothalamic preoptic region by MERFISH, and the visual cortex by multiplexed smFISH. Here, we show that SSAM detects regions occupied by known cell types that were previously missed and discovers new cell types.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsBrainComputational BiologyComputer SimulationGene Expression ProfilingImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMiceNeuronsPreoptic AreaSingle-Cell AnalysisSomatosensory CortexTranscriptomeVisual Cortex

Identifiers

PMID34112806
PMCPMC8192952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.