Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112772›Full record

ArticleNature communications2021

Enhanced mechanosensing of cells in synthetic 3D matrix with controlled biophysical dynamics.

Boguang Yang, Kongchang Wei, Claudia Loebel, Kunyu Zhang, Qian Feng, Rui Li, Siu Hong Dexter Wong, Xiayi Xu, Chunhon Lau, Xiaoyu Chen and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 94 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
94citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

94 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Nascent Extracellular Matrix Converts Biomaterial Cues into Cell Fate Decisions.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

34 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Boguang Yang *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Kongchang Wei *Department of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6555-2768
Claudia LoebelDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3140-5663
Kunyu ZhangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2481-4781
Qian FengDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Rui LiDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Siu Hong Dexter WongDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7920-4599
Xiayi XuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chunhon LauDepartment of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Xiaoyu ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Pengchao ZhaoDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Chao YinDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Jason A BurdickDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2006-332X
Yi WangDepartment of Physics, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. yiwang@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0002-4174-8790
Liming BianDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China. lbian@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID 0000-0003-4739-0918

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

3D culture of cells in designer biomaterial matrices provides a biomimetic cellular microenvironment and can yield critical insights into cellular behaviours not available from conventional 2D cultures. Hydrogels with dynamic properties, achieved by incorporating either degradable structural components or reversible dynamic crosslinks, enable efficient cell adaptation of the matrix and support associated cellular functions. Herein we demonstrate that given similar equilibrium binding constants, hydrogels containing dynamic crosslinks with a large dissociation rate constant enable cell force-induced network reorganization, which results in rapid stellate spreading, assembly, mechanosensing, and differentiation of encapsulated stem cells when compared to similar hydrogels containing dynamic crosslinks with a low dissociation rate constant. Furthermore, the static and precise conjugation of cell adhesive ligands to the hydrogel subnetwork connected by such fast-dissociating crosslinks is also required for ultra-rapid stellate spreading (within 18 h post-encapsulation) and enhanced mechanosensing of stem cells in 3D. This work reveals the correlation between microscopic cell behaviours and the molecular level binding kinetics in hydrogel networks. Our findings provide valuable guidance to the design and evaluation of supramolecular biomaterials with cell-adaptable properties for studying cells in 3D cultures.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionCellular MicroenvironmentOsteogenesisAdamantaneBiocompatible MaterialsBiomimeticsCell Culture TechniquesCholic AcidComputer SimulationCross-Linking ReagentsCyclodextrinsExtracellular MatrixHumansHydrogelsKineticsLigandsAdamantaneBiocompatible MaterialsCholic AcidCross-Linking ReagentsCyclodextrinsHydrogelsLigands

Identifiers

PMID34112772
PMCPMC8192531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.