Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112729›Full record

ArticleThe European respiratory journal2022

R-scale for pulmonary fibrosis: a simple, visual tool for the assessment of health-related quality of life.

Ciaran Scallan, Lauren Strand, Jennifer Hayes, Suha Kadura, Bridget Collins, Lawrence Ho, Carolyn Spada, Will Canestaro, Martin Kolb, Ganesh Raghu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in The European respiratory journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. ILD with or without 'asthma' defining reversibility: An appraisal.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ciaran ScallanCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7892-9336
Lauren StrandSchool of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Jennifer HayesCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Suha KaduraCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5075-1350
Bridget CollinsCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Lawrence HoCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Carolyn SpadaCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Will CanestaroSchool of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Martin KolbFirestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3837-1467
Ganesh RaghuCenter for Interstitial Lung Disease, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA graghu@uw.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePatients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) experience impaired health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Several tools have been developed to objectively assess HRQoL in this patient population, but none are in use in routine clinical practice.

objectivesTo develop a rapid, specific tool that can be used for patients with IPF during routine clinic visits.

methodsA novel and simple five-item numerical rating scale was developed and compared with two other previously validated tools. 100 consecutive patients with IPF managed at a centre for interstitial lung disease were recruited to complete the Raghu scale for pulmonary fibrosis (R-Scale-PF), King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD), and the EuroQol Five-Dimensional Five-Level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) in addition to pulmonary function and 6-min walk tests. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsAll 100 patients successfully completed the three HRQoL tools with 53 completing them again at follow-up visits. Internal consistency was high (Cronbach's α 0.825) with minimal floor/ceiling effect. Concurrent validity of the R-Scale-PF was moderate to high compared with the K-BILD (

conclusionsThe R-Scale-PF correlates well with the K-BILD and EQ-5D-5L. It is hoped that this novel simple numerical rating scale tool, subject to validation in patients from other centres, will provide an opportunity to objectively measure HRQoL in routine clinical practice for patients with IPF.

Indexed as

Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisLung Diseases, InterstitialHumansQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.