Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34112119›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Reaching early adolescents with a complex intervention for HIV prevention: findings from a cohort study to evaluate DREAMS in two informal settlements in Nairobi, Kenya.

Sarah Mulwa, Jane Osindo, Elvis O Wambiya, Annabelle Gourlay, Beatrice W Maina, Benedict O Orindi, Sian Floyd, Abdhalah Ziraba, Isolde Birdthistle

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah MulwaFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. sarah.mulwa@lshtm.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0934-6780
Jane OsindoAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Elvis O WambiyaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Annabelle GourlayFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Beatrice W MainaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Benedict O OrindiCenter for Geographic Medicine Research, Kenya Medical Research Institute - Wellcome Trust Research Programme, Kilifi, Kenya.
Sian FloydFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Abdhalah ZirabaAfrican Population and Health Research Center, Nairobi, Kenya.
Isolde BirdthistleFaculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
African Population and Health Research Center · KELondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKenya Medical Research Institute · KE

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1136774Medical Research Council MR/R010161/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe DREAMS Partnership promotes combination HIV prevention among adolescent girls and young women. We examined the extent to which DREAMS interventions reached early adolescent girls (EAG; aged 10-14 years) in two informal settlements in Nairobi, and the characteristics of those reached, after 3 years of implementation.

methodsWe utilized three data rounds from a randomly-sampled cohort of EAG established in 2017 in Korogocho and Viwandani informal settlements where DREAMS interventions were implemented. Interventions were classified as individual or contextual-level, with individual interventions further categorised as primary (prioritised for this age group), or secondary. We summarised self-reported invitation to participate in DREAMS, and uptake of eight interventions that were supported by DREAMS, during 2017-2019. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify individual and household characteristics associated with invitation to DREAMS and uptake of primary interventions.

resultsData were available for 606, 516 (retention rate of 85%) and 494 (82%) EAG in 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. Proportions invited to DREAMS increased from 49% in 2017, to 77% by 2018, and to 88% by 2019. School-based HIV and violence prevention, and HIV testing and counselling were the most accessed interventions (both at 82%). Cumulative uptake of interventions was higher among those invited to participate in DREAMS compared to those never invited, particularly for new interventions such as social asset building and financial capability training. Contextual-level interventions were accessed infrequently. Most of those invited both in 2017 and 2018 accessed ≥3 interventions (96%), and 55% received all three primary interventions by 2019.

conclusionsUptake of DREAMS interventions among a representative sample of EAG was high and quickly increased over the implementation period. The majority accessed multiple interventions, indicating that it is feasible to integrate and deliver a package of interventions to EAG in a challenging informal context.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsAdolescentCohort StudiesFemaleHumansKenyaSchoolsComplex interventionsEarly adolescent girlsHIV preventionImpact evaluationImplementation

Identifiers

PMID34112119
PMCPMC8194171
OpenAlexW3167299133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.