Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111998›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2021

Comparison of high-flow nasal oxygen cannula therapy versus a standard oxygen face mask in patients with hypostatic pneumonia.

Yamei Song, Jinchao Zhang, Jia Xing, Ning Wang, Jing Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yamei SongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Harrison International Peace Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Hengshui, China.
Jinchao ZhangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Harrison International Peace Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Hengshui, China.
Jia XingDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Harrison International Peace Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Hengshui, China.
Ning WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Harrison International Peace Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Hengshui, China.
Jing WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Harrison International Peace Hospital Affiliated to Hebei Medical University, Hengshui, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1918-8088
Hebei Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveWe assessed the clinical effects of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy and a standard oxygen atomizer mask on the respiratory tract in patients with hypostatic pneumonia.

methodsWe included patients with hypostatic pneumonia in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were provided continuous airway humidification by continuous oxygen atomization using either an HFNC or standard oxygen mask. Arterial blood gas analysis, the dyspnea score, inflammatory-related parameters, and adverse events of patients in the two groups were compared.

resultsFifty-five patients had HFNC delivery and 57 had a standard oxygen atomizer mask. After 7 days of treatment, patients in the HFNC group had a higher partial pressure of arterial blood oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (268.12±28.44 vs 238.28±30.04) and lower partial pressure of arterial blood carbon dioxide (38.02±8.84 vs 49.27±7.84 mmHg) than those in the standard oxygen mask group. The dyspnea score and inflammatory-related parameters in the HFNC group were significantly lower than those in the standard oxygen mask group. The incidence of adverse events was lower in the HFNC group than in the standard oxygen mask group.

conclusionHFNC therapy relieves clinical symptoms more quickly than a standard oxygen mask and reduces the incidence of adverse events.

Indexed as

PneumoniaRespiratory InsufficiencyCannulaHumansMasksOxygenOxygen Inhalation TherapyRetrospective StudiesOxygencritical caredyspnea scoreHigh-flow nasal cannulahypoplastic pneumoniainflammationoxygen atomization inhalationoxygen mask

Identifiers

PMID34111998
PMCPMC8202268
OpenAlexW3167889113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.