ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2022
Accuracy of CGM Systems During Continuous and Interval Exercise in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Automated insulin delivery (AID) systems, physical activity and sports in type 1 diabetes mellitus: joint guidelines of the DDG and ÖDG].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2026Guideline
- β-Cell Function Derived From Routine Clinical Measures Reports and Predicts Treatment Response to Immunotherapy in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes.Diabetes care · 2025Trial
- Management of Glycemia during Acute Aerobic and Resistance Training in Patients with Diabetes Type 1: A Croatian Pilot Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Trial
- Impact of Ascorbic Acid and Exercise on Accuracy of a Glucose Monitoring System with GDH-FAD Technology in Adult Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Double-Blinded, Randomized Trial.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Article
- The Impact of Interfering Substances on Continuous Glucose Monitors: Part 4: Continuous Glucose Monitoring Interferents: In Vivo Performance, Clinical Implications and Future Standardization.Journal of diabetes science and technology · 2026Review
- Use of Continuous Glucose Monitors in Exercise Research Studies-A Scoping Review on Study Characteristics and Common Practices.Sports (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026.Diabetes care · 2026Review
- Understanding the Increasing Prevalence of Obesity in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes: Strategies for Improving Clinical Care.Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.) · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring devices in individuals with diabetes undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a scoping review.Diving and hyperbaric medicine · 2025Article
- Review
- 14. Children and Adolescents: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2025.Diabetes care · 2025Review
- Continuous measurement of interstitial glycaemia in professional female UCI world tour cyclists undertaking a 9-day cycle training camp.European journal of sport science · 2024Article
- Estimating Glycemia From HbA1c and CGM: Analysis of Accuracy and Sources of Discrepancy.Diabetes care · 2024Article
- Factory-Calibrated Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Type 1 Diabetes: Accuracy during In-Clinic Exercise and Home Use.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- 2022: Position of Brazilian Diabetes Society on exercise recommendations for people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundcontinuous glucose monitoring systems (CGMs) play an important role in the management of T1D, but their accuracy may reduce during rapid glucose excursions. The aim of study was to assess the accuracy of recent rt-CGMs available in Italy, in subjects with T1D during 2 sessions of physical activity: moderate continuous (CON) and interval exercise (IE).
methodwe recruited 22 patients with T1D, on CSII associated or integrated with a CGM, to which a second different sensor was applied. Data recorded by CGMs were compared with the corresponding plasma glucose (PG) values, measured every 5 minutes with the glucose analyzer. To assess the accuracy of the CGMs, we evaluated the Sensor Bias (SB), the Mean Absolute Relative Difference (MARD) and the Clarke error grid (CEG).
resultsa total of 2355 plasma-sensor glucose paired points were collected. Both average plasma and interstitial glucose concentrations did not significantly differ during CON and IE. During CON: 1. PG change at the end of exercise was greater than during IE (
conclusionsthe exercise affects the accuracy of currently available CGMs, especially during CON, suggesting, in this circumstance, the need to maintain blood glucose in a "prudent" range, above that generally recommended. Further studies are needed to investigate additional types of activities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.