Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111980›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2021

CT-guided preoperative localization of ground glass nodule: comparison between the application of embolization microcoil and the locating needle designed for pulmonary nodules.

Chuan-Dong Li, Zhen-Guo Huang, Hong-Liang Sun, Li-Tao Wang, Yu-Li Wang

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Advancements in Research on Preoperative Localization of Pulmonary Nodules].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Preoperative computed tomography-guided localization of pulmonary ground‑glass nodules: a comparison of conventional and soft hook‑wires.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chuan-Dong LiDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhen-Guo HuangDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Hong-Liang SunDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
Li-Tao WangDepartment of oncology comprehensive treatment, The Second Hospital of Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China.
Yu-Li WangDepartment of Radiology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China.
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo compare the efficacy and safety of pre-operative localization of ground glass nodule (GGN) using embolization microcoils and the locating needles designed for pulmonary nodules.

methodsFrom June 2019 to December 2020, 429 patients who received CT-guided localization of single GGN before video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were enrolled. The diameter and depth of GGNs were 0.84 ± 0.39 cm and 1.66 ± 1.37 cm. Among 429 cases, the first 221 GGNs were marked with microcoils (the microcoil group), and the remaining 208 GGNs were marked with the locating needles designed for pulmonary nodules (the locating needle group). SPSS 17.0 statistical software was used to compare the marking success rate, marking time, marking-related complications between two groups.

resultsThe marking time in the microcoil group was longer than that in the locating needle group (11.1 ± 3.9 vs 8.2 ± 2.0 min,

conclusionsIt is safe and effective to perform pre-operative localization of GGN using either embolization microcoil or the locating needle designed for pulmonary nodules. The locating needle is superior to microcoil for marking GGN in terms of procedure time and the success rate. The complication rate of both methods is similar. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The locating needle designed for pulmonary nodules has recently been used to mark pulmonary nodule. Its structure can effectively avoid dislocation after localization, and the marking process is simple and quick. Compared with localization using microcoil, it takes less time and has higher success rate to mark GGNs using the locating needle. The complication rate of both methods is similar.

Indexed as

NeedlesRadiography, InterventionalTomography, X-Ray ComputedEmbolization, TherapeuticEquipment DesignFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CareSolitary Pulmonary NoduleThoracic Surgery, Video-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID34111980
PMCPMC8248215
OpenAlexW3172124010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.