Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111970›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2021

Imaging of inflammatory disease of the pancreas.

Nina Bastati, Antonia Kristic, Sarah Poetter-Lang, Alina Messner, Alexander Herold, Jacqueline C Hodge, Martin Schindl, Ahmed Ba-Ssalamah

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. An incidental finding behind adrenal incidentaloma.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina BastatiDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Antonia KristicDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Sarah Poetter-LangDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alina MessnerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexander HeroldDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jacqueline C HodgeDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Martin SchindlDepartment of Abdominal Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ahmed Ba-SsalamahDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, MedicalUniversity of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3527-404X
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Increasingly acute and chronic pancreatitis (AP and CP) are considered a continuum of a single entity. Nonetheless, if, after flare-up, the pancreas shows no residual inflammation, it is classified as AP. CP is characterised by a long cycle of worsening and waning glandular inflammation without the pancreas ever returning to its baseline structure or function. According to the International Consensus Guidelines on Early Chronic Pancreatitis, pancreatic inflammation must last at least 6 months before it can be labelled CP. The distinction is important because, unlike AP, CP can destroy endocrine and exocrine pancreatic function, emphasising the importance of early diagnosis. As typical AP can be diagnosed by clinical symptoms plus laboratory tests, imaging is usually reserved for those with recurrent, complicated or CP. Imaging typically starts with ultrasound and more frequently with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT). MRI and/or MR cholangiopancreatography can be used as a problem-solving tool to confirm indirect signs of pancreatic mass, differentiate between solid and cystic lesions, and to exclude pancreatic duct anomalies, as may occur with recurrent AP, or to visualise early signs of CP. MR cholangiopancreatography has replaced diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). However, ERCP, and/or endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) remain necessary for transpapillary biliary or pancreatic duct stenting and transgastric cystic fluid drainage or pancreatic tissue sampling, respectively. Finally, positron emission tomography-MRI or positron emission tomography-CT are usually reserved for complicated cases and/or to search for extra pancreatic systemic manifestations. In this article, we discuss a broad spectrum of inflammatory pancreatic disorders and the utility of various modalities in diagnosing acute and chronic pancreatitis.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseChronic DiseaseContrast MediaDiagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisHumansPancreatitisRecurrenceContrast Media

Identifiers

PMID34111970
PMCPMC8248196
OpenAlexW3167059945

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.