Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111344›Full record

ArticleBiomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud2021

Evaluation of UMELISA CHAGAS™ with the incorporation of new monomeric and chimeric peptides representative of different regions of Trypanosoma cruzi

Idialis Hernández, Milenen Hernández, Jeny González, Ivonne Gómez, Orlando Zulueta, Grisell Ramos, Darien Ortega, Dunia Clara Bequer, Giosvany Ernesto Martínez, Aurora Delahanty

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedica : revista del Instituto Nacional de Salud, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Idialis HernándezCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. idialis.hernandez@cie.cu.
Milenen HernándezCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Jeny GonzálezCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Ivonne GómezCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Orlando ZuluetaCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Grisell RamosCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Darien OrtegaCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Dunia Clara BequerCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Giosvany Ernesto MartínezCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Aurora DelahantyCentro de Inmunoensayo, La Habana, Cuba. biomedica@ins.gov.co.
Instituto de Hematología e Inmunología · CU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Most people with Chagas disease develop specific antibodies against Trypanosoma cruzi. In early infection, IgM antibodies against T. cruzi are produced and later replaced for IgG antibodies during the course of the disease. The first symptoms of the infection may be very mild and atypical, which is why the disease is often not detected in the acute phase. Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and analytical sensitivity, and specificity, accuracy, and efficacy of UMELISA CHAGAS™ with the addition of new synthetic peptides in the solid phase representative of the shed acute phase antigen protein (SAPA) and the trypomastigote surface antigen (TSA). Materials and methods: We evaluated a mixed anti-T. cruzi titer performance panel and a Chagas seroconversion one, as well as positive and negative serum samples from endemic areas of the disease and positive samples for other diseases that may interfere with the assay. The Bioelisa CHAGAS assay, Chaga test recombinant ELISA v.4.0, Chagatest HAI, and SD BIOLINE CHAGAS Ab Rapid were used as reference tests. Results: The sensitivity of the assay was 97.73% (95% CI: 96,23-99,24) and the clinical specificity, 99.33% (95% CI: 98,88-99,78) while the efficacy and the accuracy were 98.96%. Conclusions: Our results show that the new solid phase of UMELISA CHAGAS® can be used for immunodiagnostic, blood certification, and epidemiological surveillance in endemic and non-endemic countries with high-risk populations.

Indexed as

Chagas DiseasePeptidesTrypanosoma cruziAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayHumansSensitivity and SpecificityAntibodies, ProtozoanAntigens, ProtozoanPeptidesantibodiesChagas disease/diagnosispeptidesTrypanosoma cruzi

Identifiers

PMID34111344
PMCPMC8320777
OpenAlexW3159070392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.