ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Imaging Biomarkers of 1-Year Activity in Type 1 Macular Neovascularization.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpreting Hyperreflective Foci in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Critical Review of Cell Origins, Evolving Terminology and Clinical Utility.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Quantitative characterization of types 1 and 2 macular neovascularization in neovascular age-related macular degeneration with intravitreal conbercept: an analysis utilizing optical coherence tomography angiography.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Baseline optical coherence tomography angiography biomarkers predict visual outcomes in treatment-naïve neovascular age-related macular degeneration patients.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Prognostic Imaging Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Application of ImageJ in Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography (OCT-A): A Literature Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the predictive value of optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA) parameters at baseline on lesion's activity at the 1-year follow-up in type 1 macular neovascularizations (MNVs) treated with 1-year fixed regimen of intravitreal aflibercept injections (q8 IAIs). Methods: All patients were imaged by structural OCT to evaluate central macular thickness (CMT), subretinal fluid (SRF), subretinal hyper-reflective material (SHRM), intraretinal fluid (IRF) and intraretinal hyper-reflective dots (HRDs), and by Swept-Source OCTA to measure baseline MNV area, perfusion density (PD), vessel length density (VLD), and vessel diameter index. At the end of q8 IAI, patients were classified in two groups: active-MNV (A-MNV) and inactive-MNV (I-MNV), considering the OCT signs of activity. Three binary logistic regression models were developed: (1) OCT-based, (2) OCTA-based, and (3) OCT/OCTA-based model. Results: Thirty-one treatment-naïve type 1 MNVs were enrolled (13 A-MNV and 18 I-MNV). No differences were observed in baseline OCT and OCTA characteristics between A-MNV and I-MNV. Among the models developed, model 3 that combined OCT/OCTA parameters showed a performance of 87.5% and excellent sensitivity for A-MNV lesions (100%). By analyzing the model, the A-MNV group appears more likely to show at baseline SRF, greater CMT, wider MNV area, and lower PD and VLD compared to I-MNV. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated that the combination of baseline OCT and OCTA parameters allowed to achieve a good models' performance in the prediction of MNV activity permitting to correctly classifying the active lesions at the end of follow-up period, with excellent sensitivity. Translational Relevance: OCT/OCTA could integrate statistical models potentially useful for artificial intelligence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.