ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Calibration of the Activity Inventory Item Bank: A Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Instrument for Low Vision Rehabilitation.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rasch analysis of the new general self efficacy scale: an evaluation of its psychometric properties in older adults with low vision.Health and quality of life outcomes · 2024Trial
- Outcomes of Telerehabilitation Versus In-Office Training With Magnification Devices for Low Vision: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2024Trial
- A Within-Population Comparison of the Psychometric Properties and Clinical Feasibility of Visual Function Questionnaires in Low Vision.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Functional Vision in Patients With Biallelic USH2A Variants.American journal of ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Development of The Chinese Version of Ultra-Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire-150.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- The NEI VFQ-25C: Calibrating Items in the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 to Enable Comparison of Outcome Measures.Translational vision science & technology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To provide calibrated item measures and rating category thresholds for the Activity Inventory (AI), an adaptive visual function questionnaire, from difficulty ratings obtained from a large sample of new low vision patients at pre-rehabilitation baseline. Methods: Baseline AI (510 items) rating scale data from five previous low vision rehabilitation outcome studies (n = 3623) were combined, and the method of successive dichotomizations was used to estimate calibrated item measures and rating category thresholds. Infit statistics were analyzed to evaluate the fit of the data to the model. Factor analysis was applied to person measures estimated from different subsets of items (e.g., functional domains such as reading, mobility) to evaluate differential person functioning. Results: Estimated item measures were well targeted to the low vision patient population. The distribution of infit statistics confirmed the validity of the estimated measures and the two-factor structure previously observed for the AI. Conclusions: Our calibrated item measures and rating category thresholds enable researchers to estimate changes in visual ability from low vision rehabilitation on the same scale, facilitating comparisons between studies. Translational Relevance: The work described in this paper provides calibrated item measures and rating category thresholds for a visual function questionnaire to measure patient-centered outcomes in low vision clinical research. The calibrated AI also can be used as a patient outcome measure and quality assurance tool in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.