ArticleTranslational vision science & technology2021
Automatic Recording of the Target Location During Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement Testing Using Video-Oculography and Deep Learning-Based Object Detection.
Article in Translational vision science & technology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development of a cloud-based estimator for analysing the disc-fovea angle in fundus images using a stacking ensemble model.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Eye Tracking in Optometry: A Systematic Review.Journal of eye movement research · 2023Article
- Analysis of smooth pursuit eye movements in a clinical context by tracking the target and eyes.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Deep learning for real-time auxiliary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer in endoscopic ultrasonography.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To accurately record the movements of a hand-held target together with the smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEMs) elicited with video-oculography (VOG) combined with deep learning-based object detection using a single-shot multibox detector (SSD). Methods: The SPEMs of 11 healthy volunteers (21.3 ± 0.9 years) were recorded using VOG. The subjects fixated on a moving target that was manually moved at a distance of 1 m by the examiner. An automatic recording system was developed using SSD to predict the type and location of objects in a single image. The 400 images that were taken of one subject using a VOG scene camera were distributed into 2 groups (300 and 100) for training and validation. The testing data included 1100 images of all subjects (100 images/subject). The method achieved 75% average precision (AP75) for the relationship between the location of the fixated target (as calculated by SSD) and the position of each eye (as recorded by VOG). Results: The AP75 for all subjects was 99.7% ± 0.6%. The horizontal and vertical target locations were significantly and positively correlated with each eye position in the horizontal and vertical directions (adjusted R2 ≥ 0.955, P < 0.001). Conclusions: The addition of SSD-driven recording of hand-held target positions with VOG allows for quantitative assessment of SPEMs following a target during an SPEM test. Translational Relevance: The combined methods of VOG and SSD can be used to detect SPEMs with greater accuracy, which can improve the outcome of clinical evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.