Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111244›Full record

ArticleClinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America2022

Use of US Blood Donors for National Serosurveillance of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Antibodies: Basis for an Expanded National Donor Serosurveillance Program.

Mars Stone, Clara Di Germanio, David J Wright, Hasan Sulaeman, Honey Dave, Rebecca V Fink, Edward P Notari, Valerie Green, Donna Strauss, Debbie Kessler and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Mars StoneVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2767
Clara Di GermanioVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
David J WrightWestat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Hasan SulaemanVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Honey DaveVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Rebecca V FinkWestat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Edward P NotariAmerican Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Valerie GreenCreative Testing Solutions, Tempe, Arizona, USA.
Donna StraussNew York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Debbie KesslerNew York Blood Center, New York, New York, USA.
Mark DestreeBlood Works Northwest, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Paula SaaAmerican Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Phillip C WilliamsonVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Graham SimmonsVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
Susan L StramerAmerican Red Cross, Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA.
Jean OpsomerWestat, Rockville, Maryland, USA.
Jefferson M JonesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 Response Team, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Steven KleinmanUniversity of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Michael P BuschVitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA.
NHLBI Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-IV-Pediatric (REDS-IV-P)
American Red Cross · USNew York Blood Center · USPacific Research Institute · USUniversity of British Columbia · CACenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USWestat (United States) · USBloodworks Northwest · USVitalant · US

Funding

(REDS-IV-P) RECIPIENT EPIDEMIOLOGY AND DONOR EVALUATION STUDY IV-DATA75N92019D00032 · NHLBI · WESTAT, INC. · PI CHAPMAN, KATHY · 2019 to 2025
$19.6M
REDS-IV-P - CENTER FOR TRANSFUSION LABORATORY STUDIES (CTLS) - SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 STUDIES75N92019D00033 · NHLBI · VITALANT · PI NORRIS, PHILIP J. · 2019 to 2024
$15.6M
Protective B-cell responses in chikungunya virus infectionR01AI119056 · NIAID · VITALANT · PI SIMMONS, GRAHAM · 2016 to 2019
$1.9M
NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92019D00032NHLBI NIH HHS 75N92019D00033NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI119056NIAID NIH HHS R01AI119056NIDA NIH HHS 75N95019D00033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Recipient Epidemiology and Donor Evaluation Study-IV-Pediatric (REDS-IV-P) Epidemiology, Surveillance and Preparedness of the Novel SARS-CoV-2 Epidemic (RESPONSE) seroprevalence study conducted monthly cross-sectional testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibodies in blood donors in 6 US metropolitan regions to estimate the extent of SARS-CoV-2 infections over time.

methodsDuring March-August 2020, approximately ≥1000 serum specimens were collected monthly from each region and tested for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies using a well-validated algorithm. Regional seroprevalence estimates were weighted based on demographic differences compared with the general population. Seroprevalence was compared with reported coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) case rates over time.

resultsFor all regions, seroprevalence was <1.0% in March 2020. New York, New York, experienced the biggest increase (peak seroprevalence, 15.8% in May). All other regions experienced modest increases in seroprevalence (1%-2% in May-June to 2%-4% in July-August). Seroprevalence was higher in younger, non-Hispanic black, and Hispanic donors. Temporal increases in donor seroprevalence correlated with reported case rates in each region. In August, 1.3-5.6 estimated cumulative infections (based on seroprevalence data) per COVID-19 case were reported to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

conclusionsIncreases in seroprevalence were found in all regions, with the largest increase in New York. Seroprevalence was higher in non-Hispanic black and Hispanic than in non-Hispanic white blood donors. SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing of blood donor samples can be used to estimate the seroprevalence in the general population by region and demographic group. The methods derived from the RESPONSE seroprevalence study served as the basis for expanding SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence surveillance to all 50 states and Puerto Rico.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralBlood DonorsChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansSeroepidemiologic StudiesAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19COVID-19 srological testingSARS-CoV-2seroprevalence

Identifiers

PMID34111244
PMCPMC8406874
OpenAlexW3172222618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.