Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111242›Full record

ArticleJournal of Crohn's & colitis2021

Alteration in Urease-producing Bacteria in the Gut Microbiomes of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.

Ron Ryvchin, Vadim Dubinsky, Keren Rabinowitz, Nir Wasserberg, Iris Dotan, Uri Gophna

RetractedErratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Crohn's & colitis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oxygen Tolerance Domestication ofMicroorganisms · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Urease in acetogenicGut microbes · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Component characterization ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Expression of concern · 2022-01-24Civil Proceedings · Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Legal Reasons and/or Threats · · See also: https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjab225 Journal was previously published by Elsevier until 2015.
  • Commented on by
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ron RyvchinShmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Vadim DubinskyShmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Keren RabinowitzDivision of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Nir WasserbergSackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Iris DotanDivision of Gastroenterology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Israel.
Uri GophnaShmunis School of Biomedicine and Cancer Research, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-5652
Tel Aviv University · IL

Funding

Israeli Ministry of Science and TechnologyLeona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable TrustTel Aviv University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsBacterial urease is a major virulence factor of human pathogens, and murine models have shown that it can contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD].

methodsThe distribution of urease-producing bacteria in IBD was assessed using public faecal metagenomic data from various cohorts, including non-IBD controls [n = 55], patients with Crohn's disease [n = 291] or ulcerative colitis [n = 214], and patients with a pouch [n = 53]. The ureA gene and the taxonomic markers gyrA, rpoB, and recA were used to estimate the percentage of urease producers in each sample.

resultsLevels of urease producers in patients with IBD and non-IBD controls were comparable. In non-IBD controls and most IBD patients, urease producers were primarily acetate-producing genera such as Blautia and Ruminococcus. A shift in the type of the dominant urease producers towards Proteobacteria and Bacilli was observed in a subset of all IBD subtypes, which correlated with faecal calprotectin levels in one cohort. Some patients with IBD had no detectable urease producers. In patients with a pouch, the probiotic-associated species Streptococcus thermophilus was more common as a main urease producer than in other IBD phenotypes, and it generally did not co-occur with other Bacilli or with Proteobacteria.

conclusionsUnlike all non-IBD controls, patients with IBD often showed a shift towards Bacilli or Proteobacteria or a complete loss of urease production. Probiotics containing the species S. thermophilus may have a protective effect against colonisation by undesirable urease-producing bacteria in a subset of patients with a pouch.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeCase-Control StudiesFecesHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesStreptococcusUreaseUreaseIBDpouchUrease

Identifiers

PMID34111242
OpenAlexW3166691437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.