Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111188›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Association between tumor size and peritumoral brain edema in patients with convexity and parasagittal meningiomas.

Chansub Shin, Jae Min Kim, Jin Hwan Cheong, Je Il Ryu, Yu Deok Won, Yong Ko, Myung-Hoon Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Peritumoral edema in meningiomas: pathophysiology, predictors, and principles for treatment.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2023
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Brain MRI Radiomic First-Order Features for Presurgical Prediction of Meningioma Grading.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chansub ShinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Gyonggi-do, Korea.
Jae Min KimDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Gyonggi-do, Korea.
Jin Hwan CheongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Gyonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-0022-312X
Je Il RyuDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Gyonggi-do, Korea.
Yu Deok WonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Gyonggi-do, Korea.
Yong KoDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Medical Center, Seongdong-gu, Seoul, Korea.
Myung-Hoon HanDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hanyang University Guri Hospital, Guri, Gyonggi-do, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-1728-5017

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposePeritumoral brain edema (PTBE) is a common complication in meningioma and disruption of the tumor-brain barrier in meningioma is crucial for PTBE formation. To evaluate the association between meningioma size and PTBE, we measured meningioma volumes using the 3D slicer in patients with convexity and parasagittal meningiomas.

methodsReceiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine the optimal cut-off meningioma volume values for predicting PTBE occurrence. Logistic regressions were used to estimate the odds ratios for PTBE occurrence in patients with convexity and parasagittal meningiomas according to several predictive factors.

resultsA total of 205 convexity or parasagittal meningioma patients with no other brain disease who underwent one or more contrast-enhanced brain MRIs were enrolled in this 10-year analysis in two hospitals. The optimal cut-off meningioma volume value for prediction of PTBE in all study patients was 13.953 cc (sensitivity = 76.1%; specificity = 92.5%). If a meningioma is assumed to be a complete sphere, 13.953 cc is about 2.987 cm in diameter.

conclusionsOur study suggests a cut-off value of 3 cm meningioma diameter for prediction of PTBE in patients with convexity and parasagittal meningiomas. We believe that we have revealed why the meningioma diameter of 3 cm is clinically meaningful.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBrain EdemaFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMeningeal NeoplasmsMeningiomaMiddle AgedRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRetrospective StudiesTumor Burden

Identifiers

PMID34111188
PMCPMC8191970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.