Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34111184›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2021

Khat and neurobehavioral functions: A systematic review.

Ayan Ahmed, Manuel J Ruiz, Kathrin Cohen Kadosh, Robert Patton, Davinia M Resurrección

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ayan AhmedFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8922-8498
Manuel J RuizDepartment of Psychology, University of Extremadura, Badajoz, Badajoz, Spain.
Kathrin Cohen KadoshFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Robert PattonFaculty of Health and Medical Sciences, School of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
Davinia M ResurrecciónDepartment of Psychology, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Dos Hermanas, Sevilla, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0046-8020

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKhat is a plant that is used for its amphetamine-like stimulant properties. However, although khat is very popular in Eastern Africa, Arabian Peninsula, and the Middle East, there is still a lack of studies researching the possible neurobehavioral impairment derived from khat use.

methodsA systematic review was conducted to identify studies that assessed the effects of khat use on neurobehavioral functions. MedLine, Scopus, Cochrane, Web of Science and Open Grey literature were searched for relevant publications from inception to December 2020. Search terms included (a) khat and (b) several cognitive domains. References from relevant publications and grey literature were also reviewed to identify additional citations for inclusion.

resultsA total of 142 articles were reviewed, 14 of which met the inclusion criteria (nine human and five rodent studies). Available human studies suggest that long term khat use is associated with significant deficits in several cognitive domains, including learning, motor speed/coordination, set-shifting/response inhibition functions, cognitive flexibility, short term/working memory, and conflict resolution. In addition, rodent studies indicated daily administration of khat extract resulted in dose-related impairments in behavior such as motor hyperactivity and decreased cognition, mainly learning and memory.

conclusionsThe findings presented in this review indicates that long-term khat use may be contributing to an impairment of neurobehavioral functions. However, gaps in literature were detected that future studies could potentially address to better understand the health consequences of khat use.

Indexed as

AnimalsCathaCognition DisordersDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansHyperkinesisMemory DisordersNegotiating

Identifiers

PMID34111184
PMCPMC8192015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.